Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs SOR
CGBL vs SOR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. SOR commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and SOR is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.08B vs. SOR (381M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than SOR: CGBL (9.414) vs SOR (4.677). CGBL was incepted earlier than SOR: CGBL (2 years) vs SOR (57 years). SOR (0.00) has a lower expense ratio than CGBL (0.33). CGBL has a higher turnover SOR (11.00) vs SOR (11.00).
| CGBL | SOR | CGBL / SOR | |
| Gain YTD | 9.414 | 4.677 | 201% |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 381M | 808% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 11.00 | 218% |
| Yield | 1.91 | 11.20 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 57 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | SOR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 19 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -3.15% | ||
More | ||||
SOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SOR and FIG have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOR and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y