Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs RULE
CGBL vs RULE Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs RULE
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$35.82
Change+$0.12 (+0.34%)
Volume$488.98K
Net Assets4.41B
Adaptive Core ETF
Price$23.31
Change+$0.08 (+0.34%)
Volume$393
Net Assets12.24M
CGBL vs RULE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. RULE commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and RULE is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 4.41B vs. RULE (12.2M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than RULE: CGBL (16.195) vs RULE (6.365). CGBL was incepted earlier than RULE: CGBL (2 years) vs RULE (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than RULE (1.22). RULE has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | RULE | CGBL / RULE | |
| Gain YTD | 16.195 | 6.365 | 254% |
| Net Assets | 4.41B | 12.2M | 36,180% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.22 | 27% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 451.00 | 5% |
| Yield | 1.93 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 54% | 10 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
More | ||||
RULE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RULE and NWE have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RULE and NWE's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RULE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RULE | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| NWE - RULE | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| CNS - RULE | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| MS - RULE | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
| USB - RULE | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
| PRGO - RULE | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||