Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs MVFD
CGBL vs MVFD Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs MVFD
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.35
Change+$0.13 (+0.38%)
Volume$1.53K
Net Assets3.25B
Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF
Price$27.47
Change-$0.17 (-0.62%)
Volume$2.61K
Net Assets77.15M
CGBL vs MVFD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. MVFD commentary
Sep 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and MVFD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.25B vs. MVFD (77.2M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than MVFD: CGBL (10.414) vs MVFD (7.087). CGBL was incepted earlier than MVFD: CGBL (2 years) vs MVFD (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than MVFD (1.19). MVFD has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | MVFD | CGBL / MVFD | |
| Gain YTD | 10.414 | 7.087 | 147% |
| Net Assets | 3.25B | 77.2M | 4,209% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.19 | 28% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 264.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 1.89 | 1.44 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | MVFD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 8 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
More | ||||
MVFD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MVFD has been loosely correlated with BRSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MVFD jumps, then BRSL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MVFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MVFD | 100% | +1.09% | ||
| BRSL - MVFD | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.70% | ||
| PCAR - MVFD | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.07% | ||
| TAP - MVFD | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| FUL - MVFD | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.95% | ||
| CALM - MVFD | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
More | ||||