Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs MSMR
CGBL vs MSMR Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs MSMR
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$32.63
Change-$0.35 (-1.06%)
Volume$538.09K
Net Assets2.37B
McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF
Price$30.55
Change-$0.17 (-0.55%)
Volume$9.02K
Net Assets129.78M
CGBL vs MSMR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. MSMR commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and MSMR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 2.37B vs. MSMR (130M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than MSMR: CGBL (4.766) vs MSMR (1.380). CGBL was incepted earlier than MSMR: CGBL (2 years) vs MSMR (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than MSMR (0.99). MSMR has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | MSMR | CGBL / MSMR | |
| Gain YTD | 4.766 | 1.380 | 345% |
| Net Assets | 2.37B | 130M | 1,826% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.99 | 33% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 612.00 | 4% |
| Yield | 1.92 | 2.59 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | MSMR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 25 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 25 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 25 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 26 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 55% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 25 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -4.34% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 74% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
More | ||||