Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs MPRO
CGBL vs MPRO Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs MPRO
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$35.31
Change+$0.16 (+0.46%)
Volume$899.07K
Net Assets4.12B
Monarch ProCap ETF
Price$30.91
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
Volume$13.78K
Net Assets221M
CGBL vs MPRO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. MPRO commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Hold and MPRO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 4.12B vs. MPRO (221M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than MPRO: CGBL (13.941) vs MPRO (9.283). CGBL was incepted earlier than MPRO: CGBL (2 years) vs MPRO (5 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than MPRO (1.07). MPRO has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | MPRO | CGBL / MPRO | |
| Gain YTD | 13.941 | 9.283 | 150% |
| Net Assets | 4.12B | 221M | 1,866% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.07 | 31% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 118.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 1.93 | 1.72 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | MPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 58% | 7 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 51% | 15 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
More | ||||
MPRO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MPRO and FIG have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPRO and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPRO | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| FIG - MPRO | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.51% |