Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs MPRO
CGBL vs MPRO Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs MPRO
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$33.96
Change+$0.07 (+0.21%)
Volume$523.27K
Net Assets2.75B
Monarch ProCap ETF
Price$29.96
Change+$0.05 (+0.17%)
Volume$12.18K
Net Assets255.48M
CGBL vs MPRO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. MPRO commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and MPRO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 2.75B vs. MPRO (255M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than MPRO: CGBL (9.575) vs MPRO (5.416). CGBL was incepted earlier than MPRO: CGBL (2 years) vs MPRO (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than MPRO (1.07). MPRO has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | MPRO | CGBL / MPRO | |
| Gain YTD | 9.575 | 5.416 | 177% |
| Net Assets | 2.75B | 255M | 1,078% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.07 | 31% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 118.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 1.93 | 1.61 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | MPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 53% | 20 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
More | ||||
MPRO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MPRO and FIG have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPRO and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPRO | 100% | +0.16% | ||
| FIG - MPRO | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A |