Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs MPRO
CGBL vs MPRO Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs MPRO
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$35.62
Change-$0.20 (-0.56%)
Volume$624.19K
Net Assets4.41B
Monarch ProCap ETF
Price$30.83
Change+$0.04 (+0.13%)
Volume$20.31K
Net Assets223.12M
CGBL vs MPRO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. MPRO commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and MPRO is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 4.41B vs. MPRO (223M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than MPRO: CGBL (15.546) vs MPRO (9.177). CGBL was incepted earlier than MPRO: CGBL (2 years) vs MPRO (5 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than MPRO (1.07). MPRO has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | MPRO | CGBL / MPRO | |
| Gain YTD | 15.546 | 9.177 | 169% |
| Net Assets | 4.41B | 223M | 1,979% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.07 | 31% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 118.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 1.93 | 1.72 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | MPRO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 54% | 9 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | -2.78% | ||
More | ||||
MPRO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MPRO and FIG have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPRO and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPRO | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| FIG - MPRO | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.82% |