CGBL | MPRO | CGBL / MPRO | |
Gain YTD | 9.575 | 5.416 | 177% |
Net Assets | 2.75B | 255M | 1,078% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.07 | 31% |
Turnover | 24.00 | 118.00 | 20% |
Yield | 1.93 | 1.61 | 120% |
Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
CGBL | MPRO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago45% | 3 days ago56% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago52% | 3 days ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago64% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago89% | 5 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago53% | 20 days ago62% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago55% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago65% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CGBL | 100% | +0.21% | ||
ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +3.13% | ||
APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MPRO and FIG have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MPRO and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MPRO | 100% | +0.16% | ||
FIG - MPRO | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A |