Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs GHTA
CGBL vs GHTA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. GHTA commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Hold and GHTA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.65B vs. GHTA (43.4M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than GHTA: CGBL (12.724) vs GHTA (8.164). CGBL was incepted earlier than GHTA: CGBL (2 years) vs GHTA (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than GHTA (1.49). GHTA has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | GHTA | CGBL / GHTA | |
| Gain YTD | 12.724 | 8.164 | 156% |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 43.4M | 8,412% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.49 | 22% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 129.00 | 19% |
| Yield | 1.96 | 2.24 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | GHTA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 25 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 4 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 3 days ago 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
More | ||||
GHTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GHTA and SIRI have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GHTA and SIRI's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHTA | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| SIRI - GHTA | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| ROK - GHTA | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| BSAC - GHTA | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
| NU - GHTA | -2% Poorly correlated | +1.83% | ||
| FMX - GHTA | -3% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
More | ||||