Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs GHTA
CGBL vs GHTA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. GHTA commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and GHTA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.28B vs. GHTA (44.4M). GHTA has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: GHTA (12.419) vs CGBL (10.930). CGBL was incepted earlier than GHTA: CGBL (2 years) vs GHTA (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than GHTA (1.49). GHTA has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | GHTA | CGBL / GHTA | |
| Gain YTD | 10.930 | 12.419 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 44.4M | 7,392% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.49 | 22% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 129.00 | 19% |
| Yield | 1.89 | 2.19 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | GHTA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 53% | 6 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BLKC | 24.88 | 0.20 | +0.83% |
| Invesco Aln Glxy Blkh Usr&Dctrzd Cmr ETF | |||
| KAUG | 25.76 | 0.10 | +0.41% |
| Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Aug | |||
| DAPP | 16.94 | 0.05 | +0.30% |
| VanEck Digital Trfmt ETF | |||
| SPXE | 70.20 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares S&P 500® ex-Energy | |||
| DHS | 100.57 | -0.33 | -0.33% |
| WisdomTree US High Dividend ETF | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.47% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||
GHTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GHTA and SIRI have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GHTA and SIRI's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHTA | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| SIRI - GHTA | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.04% | ||
| OMAB - GHTA | -0% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
| ITUB - GHTA | -1% Poorly correlated | +1.57% | ||
| FMX - GHTA | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| AEM - GHTA | -4% Poorly correlated | +2.33% | ||
More | ||||