Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs GHTA
CGBL vs GHTA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. GHTA commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and GHTA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 4.22B vs. GHTA (44.4M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than GHTA: CGBL (16.001) vs GHTA (11.024). CGBL was incepted earlier than GHTA: CGBL (2 years) vs GHTA (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than GHTA (1.49). GHTA has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | GHTA | CGBL / GHTA | |
| Gain YTD | 16.001 | 11.024 | 145% |
| Net Assets | 4.22B | 44.4M | 9,509% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.49 | 22% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 129.00 | 19% |
| Yield | 1.93 | 2.22 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | GHTA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 51% | 5 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.53% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | -2.72% | ||
More | ||||
GHTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHTA has been loosely correlated with NU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHTA jumps, then NU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHTA | 100% | +0.02% | ||
| NU - GHTA | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| FMX - GHTA | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.93% | ||
| IBN - GHTA | -3% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
| ITUB - GHTA | -5% Poorly correlated | -3.20% | ||
| OMAB - GHTA | -7% Poorly correlated | +5.24% | ||
More | ||||