Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs ERH
CGBL vs ERH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. ERH commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and ERH is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 4.41B vs. ERH (115M). ERH has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: ERH (17.631) vs CGBL (15.546). CGBL was incepted earlier than ERH: CGBL (2 years) vs ERH (22 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than ERH (0.93). CGBL (24.00) and ERH (24.00) have matching turnover.
| CGBL | ERH | CGBL / ERH | |
| Gain YTD | 15.546 | 17.631 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 4.41B | 115M | 3,837% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.93 | 35% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 24.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 1.93 | 3.02 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 22 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | ERH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 54% | 12 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EEMA | 93.94 | 0.73 | +0.78% |
| iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | |||
| EWD | 49.65 | 0.34 | +0.69% |
| iShares MSCI Sweden ETF | |||
| FCTE | 25.40 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF | |||
| FDIV | 27.31 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF | |||
| USSH | 50.81 | -0.11 | -0.22% |
| WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Trsy ETF | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | -2.78% | ||
More | ||||
ERH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ERH and DTE have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ERH and DTE's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y