Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs CLSM
CGBL vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs CLSM
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$33.70
Change+$0.15 (+0.45%)
Volume$372.14K
Net Assets2.59B
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$21.88
Change+$0.13 (+0.60%)
Volume$125.96K
Net Assets121.64M
CGBL vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. CLSM commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and CLSM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 2.59B vs. CLSM (122M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than CLSM: CGBL (8.736) vs CLSM (7.616). CGBL was incepted earlier than CLSM: CGBL (2 years) vs CLSM (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than CLSM (0.79). CLSM has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | CLSM | CGBL / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 8.736 | 7.616 | 115% |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 122M | 2,120% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.79 | 42% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 681.00 | 4% |
| Yield | 1.93 | 2.00 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 54% | 19 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FXP | 10.74 | 0.22 | +2.13% |
| ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | |||
| UFEB | 34.47 | 0.11 | +0.32% |
| Innovator US Equity Ultra Bffr ETF™ Feb | |||
| SPIN | 29.65 | 0.07 | +0.24% |
| SPDR SSGA US Equity Premium Income ETF | |||
| CXH | 7.62 | 0.01 | +0.13% |
| MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust | |||
| FLBL | 24.16 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Franklin Senior Loan ETF | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +3.03% | ||
| IR - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||