Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs CLSM
CGBL vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs CLSM
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$1.08M
Net Assets3.65B
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$23.34
Change+$0.11 (+0.47%)
Volume$5.74K
Net Assets113.37M
CGBL vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. CLSM commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Hold and CLSM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.65B vs. CLSM (113M). CLSM has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: CLSM (14.792) vs CGBL (12.724). CGBL was incepted earlier than CLSM: CGBL (2 years) vs CLSM (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than CLSM (0.82). CLSM has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | CLSM | CGBL / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 12.724 | 14.792 | 86% |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 113M | 3,231% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.82 | 40% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 401.00 | 6% |
| Yield | 1.96 | 1.88 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 9 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PBP | 22.47 | 0.19 | +0.85% |
| Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | |||
| SCHY | 28.35 | 0.13 | +0.46% |
| Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | |||
| OCTD | 23.89 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - October | |||
| PLTW | 45.10 | -0.05 | -0.11% |
| Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF | |||
| ENZL | 45.17 | -0.24 | -0.54% |
| iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
More | ||||
CLSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSM and FIG have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSM and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSM | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| FIG - CLSM | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.64% |