Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs CLSM
CGBL vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs CLSM
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$35.62
Change-$0.20 (-0.56%)
Volume$624.19K
Net Assets4.41B
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$23.87
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
Volume$4.13K
Net Assets107.42M
CGBL vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. CLSM commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and CLSM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 4.41B vs. CLSM (107M). CLSM has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: CLSM (17.419) vs CGBL (15.546). CGBL was incepted earlier than CLSM: CGBL (2 years) vs CLSM (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than CLSM (0.82). CLSM has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | CLSM | CGBL / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 15.546 | 17.419 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 4.41B | 107M | 4,124% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.82 | 40% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 401.00 | 6% |
| Yield | 1.93 | 1.84 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 54% | 13 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | -2.78% | ||
More | ||||
CLSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSM and FIG have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSM and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSM | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| FIG - CLSM | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.82% |