Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs CLSM
CGBL vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs CLSM
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$33.91
Change-$0.12 (-0.35%)
Volume$629.08K
Net Assets3.08B
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$22.22
Change-$0.11 (-0.49%)
Volume$31.66K
Net Assets116.31M
CGBL vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. CLSM commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Buy and CLSM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.08B vs. CLSM (116M). CGBL (9.414) and CLSM (9.278) have matching annual dividend yield . CGBL was incepted earlier than CLSM: CGBL (2 years) vs CLSM (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than CLSM (0.79). CLSM has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | CLSM | CGBL / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 9.414 | 9.278 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 116M | 2,654% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.79 | 42% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 401.00 | 6% |
| Yield | 1.91 | 1.98 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -3.15% | ||
More | ||||
CLSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSM and FIG have been poorly correlated (+-13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSM and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSM | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| FIG - CLSM | -13% Poorly correlated | +4.08% |