Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs CLSM
CGBL vs CLSM Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs CLSM
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$35.98
Change+$1.21 (+3.48%)
Volume$986.62K
Net Assets5.03B
ETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Mod ETF
Price$23.89
Change+$0.60 (+2.58%)
Volume$50.97K
Net Assets104.03M
CGBL vs CLSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. CLSM commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Hold and CLSM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 5.03B vs. CLSM (104M). CLSM has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: CLSM (2.869) vs CGBL (2.434). CGBL was incepted earlier than CLSM: CGBL (2 years) vs CLSM (5 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than CLSM (0.82). CLSM has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | CLSM | CGBL / CLSM | |
| Gain YTD | 2.434 | 2.869 | 85% |
| Net Assets | 5.03B | 104M | 4,837% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.82 | 40% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 401.00 | 6% |
| Yield | 1.94 | 0.87 | 222% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | CLSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 52% | 5 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CTSIX | 47.67 | 0.93 | +1.99% |
| Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth I | |||
| WMMCX | 11.65 | 0.20 | +1.75% |
| TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C | |||
| GEMPX | 16.75 | 0.09 | +0.54% |
| Goldman Sachs Emerging Mkts Eq ex. Chn P | |||
| TEGYX | 40.62 | 0.11 | +0.27% |
| Touchstone Mid Cap Growth Y | |||
| PRPFX | 77.88 | -0.57 | -0.73% |
| Permanent Portfolio Permanent I | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
More | ||||
CLSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSM and FIG have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSM and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSM | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| FIG - CLSM | 2% Poorly correlated | -7.41% |