CGBD
Price
$18.00
Change
+$0.07 (+0.39%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
71 days until earnings call
SLRC
Price
$16.05
Change
+$0.03 (+0.19%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
59 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CGBD vs SLRC

Header iconCGBD vs SLRC Comparison
Open Charts CGBD vs SLRCBanner chart's image
Carlyle Secured Lending
Price$18.00
Change+$0.07 (+0.39%)
Volume$1.09M
CapitalizationN/A
SLR Investment
Price$16.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.19%)
Volume$213.56K
CapitalizationN/A
CGBD vs SLRC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGBD vs. SLRC commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBD is a Hold and SLRC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CGBD: $18.00 vs. SLRC: $16.05)
Brand notoriety: CGBD and SLRC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGBD: 557% vs. SLRC: 127%
Market capitalization -- CGBD: $826.94M vs. SLRC: $837.41M
CGBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $826.94M. SLRC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $837.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGBD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSLRC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CGBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SLRC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGBD is a better buy in the long-term than SLRC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGBD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLRC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLRC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGBD is a better buy in the short-term than SLRC.

Price Growth

CGBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.90% price change this week, while SLRC (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGBD is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

SLRC is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLRC($837M) and CGBD($827M) have the same market capitalization . SLRC has higher P/E ratio than CGBD: SLRC (10.84) vs CGBD (9.82). CGBD YTD gains are higher at: 30.747 vs. SLRC (18.336). CGBD has more cash in the bank: 22.7M vs. SLRC (11.9M). CGBD has less debt than SLRC: CGBD (979M) vs SLRC (1.18B). CGBD has higher revenues than SLRC: CGBD (101M) vs SLRC (86.5M).
CGBDSLRCCGBD / SLRC
Capitalization827M837M99%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.74718.336168%
P/E Ratio9.8210.8491%
Revenue101M86.5M117%
Total Cash22.7M11.9M191%
Total Debt979M1.18B83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGBD vs SLRC: Fundamental Ratings
CGBD
SLRC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4694
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1255
SMR RATING
1..100
2535
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6580
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGBD's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLRC (91). This means that CGBD’s stock grew significantly faster than SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

CGBD's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLRC (55). This means that CGBD’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

CGBD's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as SLRC (35). This means that CGBD’s stock grew similarly to SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

CGBD's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SLRC (47). This means that CGBD’s stock grew similarly to SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

CGBD's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as SLRC (80). This means that CGBD’s stock grew similarly to SLRC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGBDSLRC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLRC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

CGBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBD has been loosely correlated with SLRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CGBD jumps, then SLRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGBD
1D Price
Change %
CGBD100%
+0.39%
SLRC - CGBD
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
MAIN - CGBD
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
CSWC - CGBD
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
TSLX - CGBD
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
PFLT - CGBD
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
More

SLRC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLRC has been loosely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLRC jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLRC
1D Price
Change %
SLRC100%
+0.19%
ARCC - SLRC
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
FSK - SLRC
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
PNNT - SLRC
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
BBDC - SLRC
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
MFIC - SLRC
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
More