CGBD
Price
$13.81
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
67 days until earnings call
GSBD
Price
$11.49
Change
+$0.14 (+1.23%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGBD vs GSBD

Header iconCGBD vs GSBD Comparison
Open Charts CGBD vs GSBDBanner chart's image
Carlyle Secured Lending
Price$13.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$224K
Capitalization1.01B
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$11.49
Change+$0.14 (+1.23%)
Volume$662.02K
Capitalization1.31B
CGBD vs GSBD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGBD vs. GSBD commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBD is a Buy and GSBD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CGBD: $13.81 vs. GSBD: $11.49)
Brand notoriety: CGBD and GSBD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGBD: 52% vs. GSBD: 103%
Market capitalization -- CGBD: $1.01B vs. GSBD: $1.31B
CGBD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.01B. GSBD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $171.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGBD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGSBD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CGBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GSBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGBD is a better buy in the long-term than GSBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGBD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSBD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GSBD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSBD is a better buy in the short-term than CGBD.

Price Growth

CGBD (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GSBD (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.50% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBD($1.31B) has a higher market cap than CGBD($1.01B). CGBD has higher P/E ratio than GSBD: CGBD (11.80) vs GSBD (9.19). GSBD YTD gains are higher at: 3.863 vs. CGBD (-18.560). GSBD has more cash in the bank: 82.8M vs. CGBD (22.7M). CGBD has less debt than GSBD: CGBD (1.31B) vs GSBD (1.87B).
CGBDGSBDCGBD / GSBD
Capitalization1.01B1.31B77%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-18.5603.863-481%
P/E Ratio11.809.19128%
Revenue79.8MN/A-
Total Cash22.7M82.8M27%
Total Debt1.31B1.87B70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGBD vs GSBD: Fundamental Ratings
CGBD
GSBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6620
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2258
SMR RATING
1..100
4425
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6156
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2393
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4455

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGBD's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GSBD (3). This means that CGBD’s stock grew similarly to GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

CGBD's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSBD (58). This means that CGBD’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is in the same range as CGBD (44). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to CGBD’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CGBD (61). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to CGBD’s over the last 12 months.

CGBD's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSBD (93). This means that CGBD’s stock grew significantly faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGBDGSBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UBVRX83.251.10
+1.34%
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val R2
MYIFX21.360.23
+1.09%
Monetta Young Investor Growth
SNTFX20.580.18
+0.88%
Steward Values Enhanced International R6
MTCLX78.300.51
+0.66%
MFS Technology R6
HGHCX22.710.04
+0.18%
Hartford Healthcare C

CGBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBD has been closely correlated with GSBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBD jumps, then GSBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGBD
1D Price
Change %
CGBD100%
N/A
GSBD - CGBD
75%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
BCSF - CGBD
73%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
GLAD - CGBD
73%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
HTGC - CGBD
69%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
MAIN - CGBD
68%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
More

GSBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBD has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBD jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBD
1D Price
Change %
GSBD100%
+1.23%
OBDC - GSBD
82%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
TSLX - GSBD
77%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
BXSL - GSBD
77%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
BCSF - GSBD
76%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
CGBD - GSBD
75%
Closely correlated
N/A
More