CGAU
Price
$6.18
Change
-$0.47 (-7.07%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.27B
68 days until earnings call
SAND
Price
$5.98
Change
-$0.21 (-3.39%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.56B
74 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CGAU vs SAND

Header iconCGAU vs SAND Comparison
Open Charts CGAU vs SANDBanner chart's image
Centerra Gold
Price$6.18
Change-$0.47 (-7.07%)
Volume$1.14M
Capitalization1.27B
Sandstorm Gold
Price$5.98
Change-$0.21 (-3.39%)
Volume$4.98M
Capitalization1.56B
CGAU vs SAND Comparison Chart
Loading...
CGAU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGAU vs. SAND commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGAU is a Hold and SAND is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CGAU: $6.43 vs. SAND: $6.48)
Brand notoriety: CGAU and SAND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGAU: 148% vs. SAND: 65%
Market capitalization -- CGAU: $1.27B vs. SAND: $1.56B
CGAU [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.27B. SAND’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGAU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAND’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CGAU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAND’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAND is a better buy in the long-term than CGAU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGAU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAND’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGAU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGAU is a better buy in the short-term than SAND.

Price Growth

CGAU (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.16% price change this week, while SAND (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGAU is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

SAND is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAND($1.56B) has a higher market cap than CGAU($1.27B). SAND has higher P/E ratio than CGAU: SAND (37.43) vs CGAU (1.61). SAND YTD gains are higher at: 16.129 vs. CGAU (13.005). SAND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 162M vs. CGAU (144M). CGAU has more cash in the bank: 616M vs. SAND (14.8M). CGAU has less debt than SAND: CGAU (24.2M) vs SAND (435M). CGAU has higher revenues than SAND: CGAU (1.1B) vs SAND (180M).
CGAUSANDCGAU / SAND
Capitalization1.27B1.56B82%
EBITDA144M162M89%
Gain YTD13.00516.12981%
P/E Ratio1.6137.434%
Revenue1.1B180M608%
Total Cash616M14.8M4,162%
Total Debt24.2M435M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGAU vs SAND: Fundamental Ratings
CGAU
SAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2023
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8188
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9411
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGAU's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as SAND (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that CGAU’s stock grew similarly to SAND’s over the last 12 months.

CGAU's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SAND (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that CGAU’s stock grew similarly to SAND’s over the last 12 months.

CGAU's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as SAND (88) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that CGAU’s stock grew similarly to SAND’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as CGAU (48) in the null industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to CGAU’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for CGAU (94) in the null industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew significantly faster than CGAU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGAUSAND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CGAU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

CGAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGAU has been closely correlated with EGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGAU jumps, then EGO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGAU
1D Price
Change %
CGAU100%
+0.94%
EGO - CGAU
71%
Closely correlated
+3.29%
MAG - CGAU
67%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
CDE - CGAU
67%
Closely correlated
-2.72%
IAG - CGAU
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
SAND - CGAU
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
More

SAND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAND has been closely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAND jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAND
1D Price
Change %
SAND100%
+1.73%
MAG - SAND
76%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
CDE - SAND
70%
Closely correlated
-2.72%
NGD - SAND
70%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
OR - SAND
70%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
SA - SAND
68%
Closely correlated
+4.35%
More