CGAU
Price
$10.26
Change
+$0.34 (+3.43%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.08B
32 days until earnings call
PAAS
Price
$38.36
Change
+$1.56 (+4.24%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
16.17B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGAU vs PAAS

Header iconCGAU vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts CGAU vs PAASBanner chart's image
Centerra Gold
Price$10.26
Change+$0.34 (+3.43%)
Volume$1.61M
Capitalization2.08B
Pan American Silver
Price$38.36
Change+$1.56 (+4.24%)
Volume$8.05M
Capitalization16.17B
CGAU vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGAU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGAU vs. PAAS commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGAU is a Buy and PAAS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CGAU: $10.26 vs. PAAS: $38.36)
Brand notoriety: CGAU: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGAU: 96% vs. PAAS: 138%
Market capitalization -- CGAU: $2.08B vs. PAAS: $16.17B
CGAU [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.08B. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $16.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGAU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGAU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGAU is a better buy in the long-term than PAAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGAU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGAU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGAU is a better buy in the short-term than PAAS.

Price Growth

CGAU (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.55% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6013.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGAU is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.02% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($16.2B) has a higher market cap than CGAU($2.08B). CGAU has higher P/E ratio than PAAS: CGAU (30.18) vs PAAS (26.46). PAAS YTD gains are higher at: 92.064 vs. CGAU (80.316). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. CGAU (265M). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. CGAU (522M). CGAU has less debt than PAAS: CGAU (19.6M) vs PAAS (821M). PAAS has higher revenues than CGAU: PAAS (3.12B) vs CGAU (1.21B).
CGAUPAASCGAU / PAAS
Capitalization2.08B16.2B13%
EBITDA265M1.41B19%
Gain YTD80.31692.06487%
P/E Ratio30.1826.46114%
Revenue1.21B3.12B39%
Total Cash522M1.11B47%
Total Debt19.6M821M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGAU vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
CGAU
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4437
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10080
SMR RATING
1..100
8668
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3839
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
798
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5031

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGAU's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (16) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CGAU’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CGAU (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CGAU’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (68) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CGAU (86) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CGAU’s over the last 12 months.

CGAU's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CGAU’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

CGAU's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAAS (98) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CGAU’s stock grew significantly faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGAUPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGAU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDV27.020.16
+0.60%
Gabelli Dividend & Income Trust (The)
GENT10.380.01
+0.10%
Genter Capital Taxable Qual Interm ETF
VNSE37.77N/A
N/A
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select ETF
DBJP86.05-0.05
-0.06%
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
KURE20.36-0.32
-1.55%
KraneShares MSCI All China Hlth Care ETF

CGAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGAU has been closely correlated with EGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGAU jumps, then EGO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGAU
1D Price
Change %
CGAU100%
+3.43%
EGO - CGAU
77%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
AEM - CGAU
76%
Closely correlated
+2.20%
IAG - CGAU
75%
Closely correlated
+5.08%
PAAS - CGAU
75%
Closely correlated
+4.24%
AGI - CGAU
75%
Closely correlated
+2.61%
More

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
+4.24%
AEM - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
+2.20%
WPM - PAAS
76%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
AGI - PAAS
76%
Closely correlated
+2.61%
CDE - PAAS
76%
Closely correlated
+1.32%
KGC - PAAS
76%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
More