CGAU
Price
$7.27
Change
+$0.26 (+3.71%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
73 days until earnings call
PAAS
Price
$31.74
Change
+$0.33 (+1.05%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
11.53B
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CGAU vs PAAS

Header iconCGAU vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts CGAU vs PAASBanner chart's image
Centerra Gold
Price$7.27
Change+$0.26 (+3.71%)
Volume$2.17M
Capitalization1.48B
Pan American Silver
Price$31.74
Change+$0.33 (+1.05%)
Volume$3.43M
Capitalization11.53B
CGAU vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CGAU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CGAU vs. PAAS commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGAU is a Hold and PAAS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CGAU: $7.27 vs. PAAS: $31.74)
Brand notoriety: CGAU: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CGAU: 201% vs. PAAS: 70%
Market capitalization -- CGAU: $1.48B vs. PAAS: $11.53B
CGAU [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.48B. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $11.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $79.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CGAU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CGAU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGAU is a better buy in the long-term than PAAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CGAU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CGAU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the short-term than CGAU.

Price Growth

CGAU (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.41% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4693.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

CGAU is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.09% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($11.5B) has a higher market cap than CGAU($1.48B). PAAS (21.89) and CGAU (21.38) have similar P/E ratio . PAAS YTD gains are higher at: 58.318 vs. CGAU (27.768). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.26B vs. CGAU (255M). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 923M vs. CGAU (612M). CGAU has less debt than PAAS: CGAU (19.5M) vs PAAS (804M). PAAS has higher revenues than CGAU: PAAS (2.99B) vs CGAU (1.21B).
CGAUPAASCGAU / PAAS
Capitalization1.48B11.5B13%
EBITDA255M1.26B20%
Gain YTD27.76858.31848%
P/E Ratio21.3821.8998%
Revenue1.21B2.99B40%
Total Cash612M923M66%
Total Debt19.5M804M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGAU vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
CGAU
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8880
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5039
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7538

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CGAU's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (16) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CGAU’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

CGAU's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CGAU’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (80) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CGAU (88) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CGAU’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CGAU (50) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CGAU’s over the last 12 months.

CGAU's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAAS (98) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CGAU’s stock grew significantly faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGAUPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CGAU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDSI51.460.06
+0.12%
American Century® Short Dur Str Inc ETF
MARU26.47N/A
N/A
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncMarETF
RQI12.14-0.01
-0.08%
COHEN & STEERS QUALITY Income REALTY FUND
PFFL8.67-0.02
-0.26%
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Lvrgd Pref Stk ETN
SPXX18.03-0.08
-0.44%
Nuveen S&P 500 Dynamic Overwrite Fund

CGAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGAU has been closely correlated with EGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGAU jumps, then EGO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGAU
1D Price
Change %
CGAU100%
+3.71%
EGO - CGAU
77%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
AEM - CGAU
76%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
AGI - CGAU
76%
Closely correlated
+2.32%
PAAS - CGAU
75%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
WPM - CGAU
74%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
More

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
+1.05%
AEM - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
AGI - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
+2.32%
CDE - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
WPM - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
SA - PAAS
75%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
More