Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGACX vs RSEBX
CGACX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts CGACX vs RSEBX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions C
Price$11.47
Change+$0.13 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.16M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$70.45
Change+$0.41 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.12B
CGACX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGACX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGACX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. CGACX (139M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than CGACX: RSEBX (0.23) vs CGACX (0.05). CGACX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: CGACX (18 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). CGACX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). CGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGACX: RSEBX (250) vs CGACX (1000). CGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.86 vs. RSEBX (9.90). CGACX return over 5 years is better than : 58.64 vs. RSEBX (18.70).
| CGACX | RSEBX | CGACX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.45 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.45 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.520 | 8.373 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.23 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.86 | 9.90 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.37 | 33.34 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.64 | 18.70 | 313% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.80 | 41.22 | 201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement