Advertisement
CG vs USCA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CG is a Hold and USCA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.29% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
CG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-0.42% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
CG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CG | USCA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 16 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 65% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ISCV | 66.61 | 0.90 | +1.38% |
| iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF | |||
| XRLV | 55.23 | 0.52 | +0.96% |
| Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Snsv LowVol ETF | |||
| IBMS | 26.05 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Mun Bd ETF | |||
| BANX | 21.64 | -0.04 | -0.18% |
| ArrowMark Financial Corp | |||
| AAXJ | 90.78 | -0.91 | -0.99% |
| iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Jpn ETF | |||
CG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
USCA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USCA has been closely correlated with EMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if USCA jumps, then EMR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USCA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USCA | 100% | N/A | ||
| EMR - USCA | 73% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| AXP - USCA | 72% Closely correlated | +3.01% | ||
| CG - USCA | 69% Closely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| FTV - USCA | 68% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| BLK - USCA | 67% Closely correlated | +3.39% | ||
More | ||||