CG
Price
$64.14
Change
+$0.39 (+0.61%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.06B
64 days until earnings call
TETAA
Price
$14.50
Change
-$1.50 (-9.38%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
27.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CG vs TETAA

Header iconCG vs TETAA Comparison
Open Charts CG vs TETAABanner chart's image
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$64.14
Change+$0.39 (+0.61%)
Volume$68.75K
Capitalization23.06B
Teton Advisors
Price$14.50
Change-$1.50 (-9.38%)
Volume$196
Capitalization27.6M
CG vs TETAA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TETAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CG vs. TETAA commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CG is a Buy and TETAA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CG: $63.75 vs. TETAA: $14.50)
Brand notoriety: CG and TETAA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CG: 119% vs. TETAA: 8%
Market capitalization -- CG: $23.06B vs. TETAA: $27.6M
CG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $23.06B. TETAA’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $27.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTETAA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TETAA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the long-term than TETAA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TETAA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TETAA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CG and TETAA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while TETAA (@Investment Managers) price change was -9.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG($23.1B) has a higher market cap than TETAA($27.6M). TETAA (19.08) and CG (18.64) have similar P/E ratio . CG YTD gains are higher at: 28.769 vs. TETAA (7.567). TETAA has less debt than CG: TETAA (110K) vs CG (10.5B).
CGTETAACG / TETAA
Capitalization23.1B27.6M83,696%
EBITDAN/A759K-
Gain YTD28.7697.567380%
P/E Ratio18.6419.0898%
RevenueN/A10.2M-
Total CashN/A25.2M-
Total Debt10.5B110K9,545,455%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CG vs TETAA: Fundamental Ratings
CG
TETAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34100
SMR RATING
1..100
3187
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3955
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10063
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5047

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CG's Valuation (27) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for TETAA (99) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew significantly faster than TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for TETAA (100) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew significantly faster than TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (31) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TETAA (87) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew somewhat faster than TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as TETAA (55) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

TETAA's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CG (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that TETAA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGTETAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TETAA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDOC32.960.52
+1.61%
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Eq ETF
DGRE27.980.19
+0.68%
WisdomTree Emerging Mkts Qual Div Gr ETF
TCAL24.44-0.03
-0.14%
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF
JAVA68.06-0.19
-0.28%
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
BOIL29.90-1.00
-3.24%
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
-1.82%
KKR - CG
88%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
TPG - CG
86%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
ARES - CG
84%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
OWL - CG
84%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
BX - CG
84%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
More

TETAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TETAA has been loosely correlated with AMDUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TETAA jumps, then AMDUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TETAA
1D Price
Change %
TETAA100%
N/A
AMDUF - TETAA
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CG - TETAA
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
AIMFF - TETAA
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
STJPF - TETAA
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VSQTF - TETAA
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
More