CG
Price
$51.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
81 days until earnings call
TETAA
Price
$14.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

CG vs TETAA

Header iconCG vs TETAA Comparison
Open Charts CG vs TETAABanner chart's image
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$51.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.39M
CapitalizationN/A
Teton Advisors
Price$14.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.22K
CapitalizationN/A
CG vs TETAA Comparison Chart
Loading...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CG vs. TETAA commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CG is a Hold and TETAA is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (CG: $51.09 vs. TETAA: $14.65)
Brand notoriety: CG and TETAA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CG: 53% vs. TETAA: 305%
Market capitalization -- CG: $16.93B vs. TETAA: $27.1M
CG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.93B. TETAA’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $27.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTETAA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TETAA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the long-term than TETAA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.41% price change this week, while TETAA (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.71% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG($16.9B) has a higher market cap than TETAA($27.1M). CG has higher P/E ratio than TETAA: CG (77.57) vs TETAA (17.39). CG YTD gains are higher at: 28.675 vs. TETAA (4.793). TETAA has less debt than CG: TETAA (184K) vs CG (9.26B). CG has higher revenues than TETAA: CG (1.32B) vs TETAA (13.1M).
CGTETAACG / TETAA
Capitalization16.9B27.1M62,362%
EBITDAN/A2.58M-
Gain YTD28.6754.793598%
P/E Ratio77.5717.39446%
Revenue1.32B13.1M10,107%
Total CashN/A21.9M-
Total Debt9.26B184K5,030,435%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CG vs TETAA: Fundamental Ratings
CG
TETAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7689
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37100
SMR RATING
1..100
3883
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
649
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8539

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CG's Valuation (87) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as TETAA (99) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TETAA (100) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew somewhat faster than TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (38) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TETAA (83) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew somewhat faster than TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as TETAA (54) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

CG's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TETAA (49) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew somewhat faster than TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then BX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
-0.49%
BX - CG
69%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
TPG - CG
67%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
JHG - CG
66%
Closely correlated
+2.65%
APAM - CG
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
TROW - CG
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
More

TETAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TETAA has been loosely correlated with AMDUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TETAA jumps, then AMDUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TETAA
1D Price
Change %
TETAA100%
N/A
AMDUF - TETAA
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CG - TETAA
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
AIMFF - TETAA
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
STJPF - TETAA
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VSQTF - TETAA
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
More