CG
Price
$53.41
Change
-$1.67 (-3.03%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
19.85B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HLNE
Price
$131.24
Change
-$3.26 (-2.42%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.92B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CG vs HLNE

Header iconCG vs HLNE Comparison
Open Charts CG vs HLNEBanner chart's image
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$53.41
Change-$1.67 (-3.03%)
Volume$89.27K
Capitalization19.85B
Hamilton Lane
Price$131.24
Change-$3.26 (-2.42%)
Volume$8.29K
Capitalization5.92B
CG vs HLNE Comparison Chart in %
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HLNE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CG vs. HLNE commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CG is a StrongBuy and HLNE is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CG: $55.07 vs. HLNE: $134.50)
Brand notoriety: CG and HLNE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CG: 123% vs. HLNE: 116%
Market capitalization -- CG: $19.85B vs. HLNE: $5.92B
CG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $19.85B. HLNE’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $169.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHLNE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HLNE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CG and HLNE are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLNE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HLNE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the short-term than HLNE.

Price Growth

CG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.80% price change this week, while HLNE (@Investment Managers) price change was +8.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

HLNE is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.56% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG($19.8B) has a higher market cap than HLNE($5.92B). CG has higher P/E ratio than HLNE: CG (30.94) vs HLNE (24.30). CG YTD gains are higher at: 11.236 vs. HLNE (-8.142). HLNE has less debt than CG: HLNE (365M) vs CG (10.7B). CG has higher revenues than HLNE: CG (3.71B) vs HLNE (692M).
CGHLNECG / HLNE
Capitalization19.8B5.92B335%
EBITDAN/A375M-
Gain YTD11.236-8.142-138%
P/E Ratio30.9424.30127%
Revenue3.71B692M536%
Total CashN/A58.2M-
Total Debt10.7B365M2,932%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CG vs HLNE: Fundamental Ratings
CG
HLNE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5722
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4450
SMR RATING
1..100
3030
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6063
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9990
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CG's Valuation (26) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as HLNE (28). This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as HLNE (50). This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (30) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as HLNE (30). This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as HLNE (63). This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

HLNE's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (99). This means that HLNE’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGHLNE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HLNE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GVAL31.170.22
+0.73%
Cambria Global Value ETF
SPWO27.230.08
+0.31%
SP Funds S&P World ETF
ANEW51.21N/A
N/A
ProShares MSCI Trnsfmtnl Chngs ETF
BCI22.68-0.06
-0.26%
abrdn Blmb AllCmdStrK1Fr ETF
BTC44.94-0.56
-1.23%
Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
+2.17%
KKR - CG
88%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
TPG - CG
87%
Closely correlated
+2.84%
BX - CG
84%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
ARES - CG
83%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
OWL - CG
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
More

HLNE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLNE has been closely correlated with STEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLNE jumps, then STEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLNE
1D Price
Change %
HLNE100%
+1.66%
STEP - HLNE
76%
Closely correlated
+2.90%
BX - HLNE
74%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
KKR - HLNE
71%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
APO - HLNE
70%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
CG - HLNE
70%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
More