CG
Price
$58.71
Change
+$3.30 (+5.96%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
21.17B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EQH
Price
$45.52
Change
+$2.12 (+4.88%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
12.9B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CG vs EQH

Header iconCG vs EQH Comparison
Open Charts CG vs EQHBanner chart's image
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$58.71
Change+$3.30 (+5.96%)
Volume$4.81M
Capitalization21.17B
Equitable Holdings
Price$45.52
Change+$2.12 (+4.88%)
Volume$5.04M
Capitalization12.9B
CG vs EQH Comparison Chart in %
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EQH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CG vs. EQH commentary
Feb 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CG is a Hold and EQH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 08, 2026
Stock price -- (CG: $58.71 vs. EQH: $45.52)
Brand notoriety: CG and EQH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CG: 183% vs. EQH: 188%
Market capitalization -- CG: $20.99B vs. EQH: $12.9B
CG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $20.99B. EQH’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $12.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $163.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEQH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EQH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the long-term than EQH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EQH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EQH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the short-term than EQH.

Price Growth

CG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.12% price change this week, while EQH (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

EQH is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.08% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG($21.2B) has a higher market cap than EQH($12.9B). EQH has higher P/E ratio than CG: EQH (37.88) vs CG (33.00). CG YTD gains are higher at: -0.677 vs. EQH (-4.470). EQH has less debt than CG: EQH (6.36B) vs CG (12.7B). EQH has higher revenues than CG: EQH (12B) vs CG (2.99B).
CGEQHCG / EQH
Capitalization21.2B12.9B164%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.677-4.47015%
P/E Ratio33.0037.8887%
Revenue2.99B12B25%
Total CashN/A42.9B-
Total Debt12.7B6.36B200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CG vs EQH: Fundamental Ratings
CG
EQH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
678
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4831
SMR RATING
1..100
50100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6277
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
999
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQH's Valuation (20) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CG (24) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CG (48) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (50) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQH (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CG’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQH’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as EQH (77) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to EQH’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for CG (99) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew significantly faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGEQH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EQH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARMG6.981.31
+23.10%
Leverage Shares 2X Long Arm Daily ETF
XSMO80.392.59
+3.33%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
XBB41.240.09
+0.23%
BondBloxx BB Rated USD HY Corp Bd ETF
AMUB20.74N/A
N/A
UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP ETN Series B
DGZ5.85-0.09
-1.43%
DB Gold Short ETN

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
+5.96%
TPG - CG
85%
Closely correlated
+2.76%
KKR - CG
84%
Closely correlated
+4.06%
ARES - CG
82%
Closely correlated
+7.05%
APO - CG
82%
Closely correlated
+5.51%
STEP - CG
81%
Closely correlated
+5.51%
More

EQH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQH
1D Price
Change %
EQH100%
+4.88%
CRBG - EQH
85%
Closely correlated
+4.60%
KKR - EQH
80%
Closely correlated
+4.06%
CG - EQH
77%
Closely correlated
+5.96%
BX - EQH
76%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
OWL - EQH
76%
Closely correlated
+7.65%
More