CG
Price
$57.12
Change
+$0.13 (+0.23%)
Updated
Oct 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
20.61B
25 days until earnings call
EQH
Price
$47.40
Change
+$0.18 (+0.38%)
Updated
Oct 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.14B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CG vs EQH

Header iconCG vs EQH Comparison
Open Charts CG vs EQHBanner chart's image
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$57.12
Change+$0.13 (+0.23%)
Volume$42.21K
Capitalization20.61B
Equitable Holdings
Price$47.40
Change+$0.18 (+0.38%)
Volume$17.7K
Capitalization14.14B
CG vs EQH Comparison Chart in %
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EQH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CG vs. EQH commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CG is a Hold and EQH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CG: $56.99 vs. EQH: $47.22)
Brand notoriety: CG and EQH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CG: 71% vs. EQH: 116%
Market capitalization -- CG: $20.61B vs. EQH: $14.14B
CG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $20.61B. EQH’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $14.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $181.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEQH’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EQH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQH is a better buy in the long-term than CG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EQH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EQH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the short-term than EQH.

Price Growth

CG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.57% price change this week, while EQH (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

EQH is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.47% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG($20.6B) has a higher market cap than EQH($14.1B). EQH has higher P/E ratio than CG: EQH (36.60) vs CG (16.66). CG YTD gains are higher at: 15.114 vs. EQH (1.630). EQH has less debt than CG: EQH (6.8B) vs CG (10.7B). EQH has higher revenues than CG: EQH (13.6B) vs CG (3.71B).
CGEQHCG / EQH
Capitalization20.6B14.1B146%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.1141.630927%
P/E Ratio16.6636.6046%
Revenue3.71B13.6B27%
Total CashN/A43.5B-
Total Debt10.7B6.8B157%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CG vs EQH: Fundamental Ratings
CG
EQH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5461
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3812
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9491
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1008
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQH's Valuation (24) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CG (25) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CG (38) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's SMR Rating (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CG (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's Price Growth Rating (91) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as CG (94) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for CG (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew significantly faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGEQH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EQH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EUDV53.410.48
+0.90%
ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Gr ETF
GDO11.870.03
+0.25%
Western Asset Global Corporate Opportunity Fund Inc
PRXG35.55-0.12
-0.34%
Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF
QVMM29.86-0.36
-1.18%
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Mlt-fctr ETF
HODL30.62-0.85
-2.70%
VanEck Bitcoin ETF

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
-4.06%
KKR - CG
89%
Closely correlated
-5.58%
TPG - CG
87%
Closely correlated
-3.99%
ARES - CG
85%
Closely correlated
-6.52%
BX - CG
85%
Closely correlated
-3.62%
OWL - CG
84%
Closely correlated
-7.18%
More

EQH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQH
1D Price
Change %
EQH100%
-2.96%
CRBG - EQH
85%
Closely correlated
-4.76%
AMP - EQH
81%
Closely correlated
-2.81%
CG - EQH
80%
Closely correlated
-4.06%
JHG - EQH
79%
Closely correlated
-4.95%
PFG - EQH
79%
Closely correlated
-3.10%
More