Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWIX vs FSDPX
CFWIX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts CFWIX vs FSDPX
Calvert Global Water I
Price$30.34
Change+$0.07 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets546.26M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$92.41
Change+$0.47 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets729.08M
CFWIX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWIX vs. FSDPX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWIX is a Buy and FSDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 729M vs. CFWIX (546M). CFWIX pays higher dividends than FSDPX: CFWIX (1.69) vs FSDPX (0.92). CFWIX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: CFWIX (11 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). CFWIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. CFWIX (29.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWIX: FSDPX (0) vs CFWIX (1000000). CFWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.42 vs. FSDPX (-4.47). CFWIX return over 5 years is better than : 54.15 vs. FSDPX (40.21).
| CFWIX | FSDPX | CFWIX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.70 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.70 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.746 | 9.960 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 546M | 729M | 75% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 0.92 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.42 | -4.47 | -76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.87 | 5.02 | 555% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.15 | 40.21 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.20 | 30.71 | 336% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement