CFWFF
Price
$2.50
Change
-$0.08 (-3.10%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
322.08M
THNPY
Price
$41.85
Change
-$0.45 (-1.06%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.01B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFWFF vs THNPY

Header iconCFWFF vs THNPY Comparison
Open Charts CFWFF vs THNPYBanner chart's image
Calfrac Well Services
Price$2.50
Change-$0.08 (-3.10%)
Volume$400
Capitalization322.08M
Technip Energies
Price$41.85
Change-$0.45 (-1.06%)
Volume$7.4K
Capitalization4.01B
CFWFF vs THNPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THNPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFWFF vs. THNPY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWFF is a Hold and THNPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CFWFF: $2.50 vs. THNPY: $41.85)
Brand notoriety: CFWFF and THNPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFWFF: 31% vs. THNPY: 183%
Market capitalization -- CFWFF: $322.08M vs. THNPY: $4.01B
CFWFF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $322.08M. THNPY’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $4.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFWFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTHNPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFWFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • THNPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, THNPY is a better buy in the long-term than CFWFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFWFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THNPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFWFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • THNPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, THNPY is a better buy in the short-term than CFWFF.

Price Growth

CFWFF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.44% price change this week, while THNPY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +1.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

THNPY is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.17% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
THNPY($4.01B) has a higher market cap than CFWFF($322M). THNPY has higher P/E ratio than CFWFF: THNPY (11.88) vs CFWFF (3.98). THNPY YTD gains are higher at: 62.012 vs. CFWFF (-5.371). THNPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 592M vs. CFWFF (264M). THNPY has higher revenues than CFWFF: THNPY (6.28B) vs CFWFF (1.7B).
CFWFFTHNPYCFWFF / THNPY
Capitalization322M4.01B8%
EBITDA264M592M45%
Gain YTD-5.37162.012-9%
P/E Ratio3.9811.8834%
Revenue1.7B6.28B27%
Total Cash23.2MN/A-
Total Debt365MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFWFF: Fundamental Ratings
CFWFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFWFFTHNPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THNPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHPS35.360.21
+0.60%
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF
FEP47.850.20
+0.42%
First Trust Europe AlphaDEX® ETF
GLL21.950.08
+0.37%
ProShares UltraShort Gold
IGEB45.21-0.09
-0.20%
iShares Investment Grade Systmtc Bd ETF
ETHU58.64-1.38
-2.30%
2x Ether ETF

CFWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFWFF and TOLWF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFWFF and TOLWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFWFF
1D Price
Change %
CFWFF100%
-3.02%
TOLWF - CFWFF
26%
Poorly correlated
+16.59%
CESDF - CFWFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.89%
SAPMY - CFWFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFRD - CFWFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
THNPY - CFWFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
More

THNPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THNPY has been loosely correlated with SUBCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if THNPY jumps, then SUBCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THNPY
1D Price
Change %
THNPY100%
-1.06%
SUBCY - THNPY
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
TTI - THNPY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CESDF - THNPY
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.89%
VAL - THNPY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
PUMP - THNPY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
More