CFWFF
Price
$3.63
Change
+$0.28 (+8.36%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
359.62M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NOV
Price
$17.89
Change
+$0.21 (+1.19%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:56 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.45B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFWFF vs NOV

Header iconCFWFF vs NOV Comparison
Open Charts CFWFF vs NOVBanner chart's image
Calfrac Well Services
Price$3.63
Change+$0.28 (+8.36%)
Volume$3.15K
Capitalization359.62M
NOV
Price$17.89
Change+$0.21 (+1.19%)
Volume$5.5K
Capitalization6.45B
CFWFF vs NOV Comparison Chart in %
CFWFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFWFF vs. NOV commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWFF is a Hold and NOV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CFWFF: $3.63 vs. NOV: $17.69)
Brand notoriety: CFWFF and NOV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFWFF: 9% vs. NOV: 159%
Market capitalization -- CFWFF: $359.62M vs. NOV: $6.45B
CFWFF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $359.62M. NOV’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $6.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $70.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFWFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNOV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFWFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NOV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NOV is a better buy in the long-term than CFWFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFWFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFWFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NOV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFWFF is a better buy in the short-term than NOV.

Price Growth

CFWFF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +23.89% price change this week, while NOV (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +5.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +4.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

NOV is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+4.40% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NOV($6.45B) has a higher market cap than CFWFF($360M). CFWFF has higher P/E ratio than NOV: CFWFF (20.58) vs NOV (17.87). CFWFF YTD gains are higher at: 15.238 vs. NOV (13.180). NOV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 951M vs. CFWFF (190M). CFWFF has less debt than NOV: CFWFF (330M) vs NOV (2.36B). NOV has higher revenues than CFWFF: NOV (8.78B) vs CFWFF (1.48B).
CFWFFNOVCFWFF / NOV
Capitalization360M6.45B6%
EBITDA190M951M20%
Gain YTD15.23813.180116%
P/E Ratio20.5817.87115%
Revenue1.48B8.78B17%
Total Cash579KN/A-
Total Debt330M2.36B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFWFF vs NOV: Fundamental Ratings
CFWFF
NOV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8669
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10072
SMR RATING
1..100
8783
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOV's Valuation (36) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CFWFF (65) in the null industry. This means that NOV’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

NOV's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CFWFF (100) in the null industry. This means that NOV’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

NOV's SMR Rating (83) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CFWFF (87) in the null industry. This means that NOV’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CFWFF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as NOV (40) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CFWFF’s stock grew similarly to NOV’s over the last 12 months.

CFWFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as NOV (5) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CFWFF’s stock grew similarly to NOV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFWFFNOV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFWFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMCPX36.740.11
+0.30%
ClearBridge Mid Cap 1
NCBVX23.020.05
+0.22%
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val C
FEAAX67.76N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia A
AMAGX95.65N/A
N/A
Amana Growth Investor
JLFSX11.78-0.02
-0.17%
JHancock Global Climate Action I

CFWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFWFF and NOA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFWFF and NOA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFWFF
1D Price
Change %
CFWFF100%
+8.36%
NOA - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
CLB - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
TOLWF - CFWFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
HAL - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
NOV - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
More

NOV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOV has been closely correlated with FTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOV jumps, then FTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOV
1D Price
Change %
NOV100%
-0.17%
FTI - NOV
81%
Closely correlated
+3.59%
SLB - NOV
79%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
HAL - NOV
77%
Closely correlated
+1.32%
RES - NOV
74%
Closely correlated
+2.99%
WFRD - NOV
73%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
More