CFWFF
Price
$2.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
210.74M
CIMEF
Price
$0.82
Change
+$0.04 (+5.13%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFWFF vs CIMEF

Header iconCFWFF vs CIMEF Comparison
Open Charts CFWFF vs CIMEFBanner chart's image
Calfrac Well Services
Price$2.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.25K
Capitalization210.74M
CIMC Enric Holdings
Price$0.82
Change+$0.04 (+5.13%)
Volume$3.12K
Capitalization1.83B
CFWFF vs CIMEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFWFF vs. CIMEF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWFF is a Hold and CIMEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CFWFF: $2.45 vs. CIMEF: $0.82)
Brand notoriety: CFWFF and CIMEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFWFF: 12% vs. CIMEF: 66%
Market capitalization -- CFWFF: $210.74M vs. CIMEF: $1.83B
CFWFF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $210.74M. CIMEF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $1.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFWFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCIMEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFWFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CIMEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIMEF is a better buy in the long-term than CFWFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFWFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIMEF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFWFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • CIMEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIMEF is a better buy in the short-term than CFWFF.

Price Growth

CFWFF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -0.81% price change this week, while CIMEF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.61% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMEF($1.83B) has a higher market cap than CFWFF($211M). CFWFF has higher P/E ratio than CIMEF: CFWFF (28.16) vs CIMEF (10.33). CIMEF YTD gains are higher at: -5.590 vs. CFWFF (-7.337).
CFWFFCIMEFCFWFF / CIMEF
Capitalization211M1.83B12%
EBITDA219MN/A-
Gain YTD-7.337-5.590131%
P/E Ratio28.1610.33273%
Revenue1.58BN/A-
Total Cash51.8MN/A-
Total Debt373MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFWFF vs CIMEF: Fundamental Ratings
CFWFF
CIMEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
9164
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
179
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIMEF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFWFF (76). This means that CIMEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CIMEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CFWFF (100). This means that CIMEF’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CIMEF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as CFWFF (91). This means that CIMEF’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CIMEF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CFWFF (80). This means that CIMEF’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CFWFF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIMEF (79). This means that CFWFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CIMEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFWFFCIMEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCECX13.480.06
+0.45%
Steward Values Enhanced SmMidCapI
IFPUX22.680.09
+0.40%
Independent Franchise Partners US Equity
GMAYX23.410.08
+0.34%
GMO Small Cap Quality I
FAPHX13.42N/A
N/A
Fidelity Healthy Future
PNOCX88.46-0.16
-0.18%
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C

CFWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFWFF and TOLWF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFWFF and TOLWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFWFF
1D Price
Change %
CFWFF100%
N/A
TOLWF - CFWFF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.03%
CESDF - CFWFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
SAPMY - CFWFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFRD - CFWFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
THNPY - CFWFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
More

CIMEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIMEF and AKRYY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIMEF and AKRYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIMEF
1D Price
Change %
CIMEF100%
N/A
AKRYY - CIMEF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
XPRO - CIMEF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
MDIKF - CIMEF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFWFF - CIMEF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFXT - CIMEF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
More