Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWCX vs FSDPX
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts CFWCX vs FSDPX
Calvert Global Water C
Price$26.76
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets562.61M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$93.40
Change-$1.31 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets693.09M
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWCX is a StrongBuy and FSDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 693M vs. CFWCX (563M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than CFWCX: FSDPX (0.90) vs CFWCX (0.75). CFWCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: CFWCX (17 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). CFWCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. CFWCX (24.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWCX: FSDPX (0) vs CFWCX (1000). FSDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.73 vs. CFWCX (8.60). FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 19.41 vs. CFWCX (17.77).
| CFWCX | FSDPX | CFWCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.70 | 284% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.70 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.762 | 12.696 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 563M | 693M | 81% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.90 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.60 | 10.73 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.75 | 0.94 | 2,200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.77 | 19.41 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.39 | 43.04 | 210% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers