Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWCX vs FSDPX
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison
Open Charts CFWCX vs FSDPX
Calvert Global Water C
Price$28.37
Change+$0.59 (+2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets580.32M
Fidelity Select Materials
Price$103.26
Change+$10.54 (+11.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets762.86M
CFWCX vs FSDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWCX vs. FSDPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWCX is a Hold and FSDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSDPX has more cash in the bank: 763M vs. CFWCX (580M). FSDPX pays higher dividends than CFWCX: FSDPX (1.16) vs CFWCX (0.25). CFWCX was incepted earlier than FSDPX: CFWCX (17 years) vs FSDPX (39 years). CFWCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSDPX (0.70). FSDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. CFWCX (24.00). FSDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWCX: FSDPX (0) vs CFWCX (1000). FSDPX (15.92) and CFWCX (15.21) have marching annual gain over last year. FSDPX return over 5 years is better than : 25.34 vs. CFWCX (21.20).
| CFWCX | FSDPX | CFWCX / FSDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.70 | 284% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.70 | 291% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.057 | 9.837 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 580M | 763M | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.16 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.21 | 15.92 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.77 | 2.47 | 680% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.20 | 25.34 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.81 | 74.34 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers