Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWCX vs FFGTX
CFWCX vs FFGTX Comparison
Open Charts CFWCX vs FFGTX
Calvert Global Water C
Price$28.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets566.45M
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$21.35
Change-$0.18 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets927.58M
CFWCX vs FFGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWCX vs. FFGTX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWCX is a Hold and FFGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 928M vs. CFWCX (566M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than CFWCX: FFGTX (1.61) vs CFWCX (0.75). CFWCX was incepted earlier than FFGTX: CFWCX (17 years) vs FFGTX (17 years). CFWCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CFWCX (29.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWCX: FFGTX (0) vs CFWCX (1000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. CFWCX (-1.46). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 108.23 vs. CFWCX (37.11).
| CFWCX | FFGTX | CFWCX / FFGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.40 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.40 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.299 | 18.942 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 566M | 928M | 61% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.61 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.46 | 12.74 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.38 | 21.52 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.11 | 108.23 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.54 | 127.07 | 74% |