Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWAX vs INRSX
CFWAX vs INRSX Comparison
Open Charts CFWAX vs INRSX
Calvert Global Water A
Price$30.51
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets549.11M
Macquarie Natural Resources R6
Price$18.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.47M
CFWAX vs INRSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWAX vs. INRSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWAX is a Buy and INRSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFWAX has more cash in the bank: 549M vs. INRSX (177M). INRSX pays higher dividends than CFWAX: INRSX (5.12) vs CFWAX (1.47). CFWAX was incepted earlier than INRSX: CFWAX (17 years) vs INRSX (11 years). CFWAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than INRSX (1.10). INRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CFWAX (29.00). INRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWAX: INRSX (0) vs CFWAX (1000). INRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.01 vs. CFWAX (3.54). INRSX return over 5 years is better than : 87.41 vs. CFWAX (46.53).
| CFWAX | INRSX | CFWAX / INRSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.95 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.10 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.184 | 15.115 | 94% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 549M | 177M | 310% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 5.12 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.54 | 12.01 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.63 | 17.83 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.53 | 87.41 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.52 | 42.27 | 238% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers