Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSMX vs VMVAX
CFSMX vs VMVAX Comparison
Open Charts CFSMX vs VMVAX
Clarkston Partners Founders
Price$13.83
Change+$0.09 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets943.57M
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Admiral
Price$89.49
Change+$0.09 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.03B
CFSMX vs VMVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSMX vs. VMVAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSMX is a Buy and VMVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMVAX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. CFSMX (944M). VMVAX pays higher dividends than CFSMX: VMVAX (2.15) vs CFSMX (0.52). CFSMX was incepted earlier than VMVAX: CFSMX (10 years) vs VMVAX (14 years). CFSMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VMVAX (0.07). CFSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. VMVAX (19.00). VMVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSMX: VMVAX (3000) vs CFSMX (100000000). VMVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.20 vs. CFSMX (-2.40). VMVAX return over 5 years is better than : 67.70 vs. CFSMX (9.15).
| CFSMX | VMVAX | CFSMX / VMVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.07 | 1,214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.07 | 1,257% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.408 | 6.882 | -64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 3000 | 3,333,333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 944M | 32B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 2.15 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.40 | 7.20 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.09 | 29.26 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.15 | 67.70 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement