Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSMX vs VEVYX
CFSMX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts CFSMX vs VEVYX
Clarkston Partners Founders
Price$12.93
Change-$0.48 (-3.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets640.07M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$48.07
Change+$1.75 (+3.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.2B
CFSMX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSMX vs. VEVYX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSMX is a Hold and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. CFSMX (640M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than CFSMX: VEVYX (0.89) vs CFSMX (0.46). CFSMX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: CFSMX (10 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). CFSMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. CFSMX (22.00). VEVYX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSMX: VEVYX (1000000) vs CFSMX (100000000). VEVYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. CFSMX (-10.10). VEVYX return over 5 years is better than : 20.54 vs. CFSMX (-15.90).
| CFSMX | VEVYX | CFSMX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.66 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.571 | 6.775 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 640M | 16.2B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.89 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.10 | 2.79 | -362% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.22 | 3.61 | -394% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.90 | 20.54 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.07 | 88.67 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers