Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSMX vs JVMCX
CFSMX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts CFSMX vs JVMCX
Clarkston Partners Founders
Price$13.83
Change+$0.09 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets943.57M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.32B
CFSMX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSMX vs. JVMCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSMX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. CFSMX (944M). CFSMX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: CFSMX (0.52) vs JVMCX (0.00). CFSMX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: CFSMX (10 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than CFSMX (0.88). JVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CFSMX (22.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSMX: JVMCX (1000) vs CFSMX (100000000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.22 vs. CFSMX (-2.40). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.03 vs. CFSMX (9.15).
| CFSMX | JVMCX | CFSMX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.85 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.86 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.408 | 11.265 | -39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000 | 10,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 944M | 24.3B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.40 | 1.22 | -196% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.09 | 21.25 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.15 | 48.03 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement