Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSIX vs RGAHX
CFSIX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts CFSIX vs RGAHX
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Y
Price$20.71
Change+$0.32 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.49B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.72
Change+$0.80 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
CFSIX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSIX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSIX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. CFSIX (2.49B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than CFSIX: RGAHX (0.47) vs CFSIX (0.00). CFSIX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: CFSIX (21 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). CFSIX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). CFSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSIX: RGAHX (250) vs CFSIX (2500). CFSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.69 vs. RGAHX (10.98). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 50.13 vs. CFSIX (23.13).
| CFSIX | RGAHX | CFSIX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.44 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.44 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.698 | 11.275 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.49B | 323B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.69 | 10.98 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 105.05 | 60.14 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.13 | 50.13 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.13 | N/A | - |