Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSIX vs RGACX
CFSIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CFSIX vs RGACX
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Y
Price$21.45
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.53B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
CFSIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSIX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSIX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. CFSIX (2.53B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CFSIX: RGACX (0.07) vs CFSIX (0.00). CFSIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CFSIX (21 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CFSIX (0.88). CFSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSIX: RGACX (250) vs CFSIX (2500). CFSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.30 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. CFSIX (16.01).
| CFSIX | RGACX | CFSIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.94 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.832 | 15.516 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 332B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.30 | 17.83 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 109.47 | 58.53 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.01 | 40.02 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.57 | 95.93 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers