Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSIX vs RGACX
CFSIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CFSIX vs RGACX
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Y
Price$21.77
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.53B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
CFSIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSIX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSIX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. CFSIX (2.53B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CFSIX: RGACX (0.07) vs CFSIX (0.00). CFSIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CFSIX (21 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CFSIX (0.88). CFSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSIX: RGACX (250) vs CFSIX (2500). CFSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.38 vs. RGACX (12.22). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.63 vs. CFSIX (17.55).
| CFSIX | RGACX | CFSIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.94 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.620 | 17.183 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 337B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.38 | 12.22 | 257% |
| Returns for 3 years | 131.60 | 71.26 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.55 | 45.63 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.62 | 111.15 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement