Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSIX vs RGACX
CFSIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CFSIX vs RGACX
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Y
Price$21.25
Change+$0.07 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.51B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
CFSIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSIX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSIX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. CFSIX (2.51B). RGACX pays higher dividends than CFSIX: RGACX (0.07) vs CFSIX (0.00). CFSIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CFSIX (21 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CFSIX (0.88). CFSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSIX: RGACX (250) vs CFSIX (2500). CFSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.23 vs. RGACX (14.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. CFSIX (18.25).
| CFSIX | RGACX | CFSIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.94 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.715 | 14.044 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.51B | 329B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.23 | 14.08 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.72 | 41.19 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.25 | 41.95 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.64 | 83.68 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers