CFPZF vs HMTC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFPZF is a Hold and HMTC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CFPZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHMTC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CFPZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HMTC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CFPZF (@Forest Products) experienced а -8.50% price change this week, while HMTC (@Forest Products) price change was +31.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.57%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Forest Products (-0.89% weekly)Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).
| CFPZF | HMTC | CFPZF / HMTC | |
| Capitalization | 1.89B | 872K | 216,284% |
| EBITDA | 19.9M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -23.702 | -37.121 | 64% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.26 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.87B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 861M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 386M | N/A | - |
CFPZF | HMTC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HMTC's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPZF (67). This means that HMTC’s stock grew similarly to CFPZF’s over the last 12 months.
HMTC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPZF (100). This means that HMTC’s stock grew similarly to CFPZF’s over the last 12 months.
CFPZF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as HMTC (100). This means that CFPZF’s stock grew similarly to HMTC’s over the last 12 months.
HMTC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFPZF (80). This means that HMTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFPZF’s over the last 12 months.
CFPZF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HMTC (97). This means that CFPZF’s stock grew significantly faster than HMTC’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
CFPZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFPZF has been loosely correlated with IFSPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFPZF jumps, then IFSPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CFPZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFPZF | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| IFSPF - CFPZF | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| ACAZF - CFPZF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
| WFSTF - CFPZF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| UFPI - CFPZF | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| CFXTF - CFPZF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
HMTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HMTC and BSTO have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HMTC and BSTO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HMTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMTC | 100% | N/A | ||
| BSTO - HMTC | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SCABY - HMTC | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WFSTF - HMTC | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| CFPZF - HMTC | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
| SSD - HMTC | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
More | ||||