CFPUF vs UPMMY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFPUF is a Hold and UPMMY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CFPUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUPMMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CFPUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UPMMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
UPMMY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- UPMMY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CFPUF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UPMMY (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -5.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -2.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.70%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pulp & Paper (-2.98% weekly)The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
| CFPUF | UPMMY | CFPUF / UPMMY | |
| Capitalization | 81.4M | 17.7B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -34.9M | 2.28B | -2% |
| Gain YTD | -50.537 | -23.306 | 217% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.05 | 11.71 | 60% |
| Revenue | 876M | 12B | 7% |
| Total Cash | 21.1M | 886M | 2% |
| Total Debt | 109M | 3.63B | 3% |
CFPUF | UPMMY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UPMMY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFPUF (57). This means that UPMMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.
UPMMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPUF (100). This means that UPMMY’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.
UPMMY's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPUF (98). This means that UPMMY’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.
CFPUF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as UPMMY (83). This means that CFPUF’s stock grew similarly to UPMMY’s over the last 12 months.
UPMMY's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPUF (99). This means that UPMMY’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.
| UPMMY | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% |
CFPUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CFPUF and UPMMY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFPUF and UPMMY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CFPUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFPUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| UPMMY - CFPUF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
| KLBAY - CFPUF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ITP - CFPUF | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| BLRDF - CFPUF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SUZ - CFPUF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||
UPMMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPMMY has been closely correlated with SEOAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UPMMY jumps, then SEOAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPMMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPMMY | 100% | +0.64% | ||
| SEOAY - UPMMY | 71% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| MONDY - UPMMY | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| MERC - UPMMY | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.10% | ||
| CFPUF - UPMMY | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SLVM - UPMMY | 20% Poorly correlated | -8.38% | ||
More | ||||