CFPUF
Price
$0.41
Change
-$0.01 (-2.38%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
26.44M
ITP
Price
$0.21
Change
+$0.01 (+5.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFPUF vs ITP

Header iconCFPUF vs ITP Comparison
Open Charts CFPUF vs ITPBanner chart's image
Canfor Pulp Products
Price$0.41
Change-$0.01 (-2.38%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization26.44M
IT Tech Packaging
Price$0.21
Change+$0.01 (+5.00%)
Volume$145.55K
Capitalization3.53M
CFPUF vs ITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ITP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFPUF vs. ITP commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFPUF is a Hold and ITP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CFPUF: $0.41 vs. ITP: $0.21)
Brand notoriety: CFPUF and ITP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFPUF: 132% vs. ITP: 6%
Market capitalization -- CFPUF: $26.44M vs. ITP: $3.53M
CFPUF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $26.44M. ITP’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $3.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFPUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileITP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CFPUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ITP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ITP is a better buy in the long-term than CFPUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFPUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ITP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFPUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • ITP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CFPUF and ITP are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CFPUF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а -2.74% price change this week, while ITP (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +3.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+0.56% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFPUF($26.4M) has a higher market cap than ITP($3.53M). CFPUF YTD gains are higher at: -18.033 vs. ITP (-65.414). ITP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.06M vs. CFPUF (-153.8M). ITP has more cash in the bank: 6.47M vs. CFPUF (1.3M). ITP has less debt than CFPUF: ITP (10.2M) vs CFPUF (76.6M). CFPUF has higher revenues than ITP: CFPUF (730M) vs ITP (78.4M).
CFPUFITPCFPUF / ITP
Capitalization26.4M3.53M748%
EBITDA-153.8M4.06M-3,784%
Gain YTD-18.033-65.41428%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue730M78.4M931%
Total Cash1.3M6.47M20%
Total Debt76.6M10.2M751%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFPUF vs ITP: Fundamental Ratings
CFPUF
ITP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5083
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9895
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8763
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9897
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ITP's Valuation (64) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (66) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (100) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's SMR Rating (95) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (98) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (87) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (98) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFPUFITP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ITP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCKRF33.70N/A
N/A
Teck Resources Ltd.
BOSSY9.79N/A
N/A
Hugo Boss AG
SRXXF9.90N/A
N/A
SPARX Asset Management Co., Ltd.
CGXEF0.11N/A
-3.56%
CGX Energy Inc.
ARWYF0.05-0.01
-20.00%
ARWAY CORP.

CFPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFPUF and UPMMY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFPUF and UPMMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFPUF
1D Price
Change %
CFPUF100%
-2.74%
UPMMY - CFPUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
KLBAY - CFPUF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITP - CFPUF
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.00%
BLRDF - CFPUF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUZ - CFPUF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More

ITP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ITP and CFPUF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITP and CFPUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITP
1D Price
Change %
ITP100%
+4.00%
CFPUF - ITP
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
CLW - ITP
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
LMPMF - ITP
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MERC - ITP
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
SUZ - ITP
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More