CFOO
Price
$0.66
Change
-$0.09 (-12.00%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
13.45M
CUSI
Price
$18.04
Change
+$0.04 (+0.22%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
43.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFOO vs CUSI

Header iconCFOO vs CUSI Comparison
Open Charts CFOO vs CUSIBanner chart's image
China Foods Holdings
Price$0.66
Change-$0.09 (-12.00%)
Volume$478
Capitalization13.45M
Cuisine Solutions
Price$18.04
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
Volume$42.39K
Capitalization43.9M
CFOO vs CUSI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CUSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFOO vs. CUSI commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFOO is a Hold and CUSI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CFOO: $0.66 vs. CUSI: $18.04)
Brand notoriety: CFOO and CUSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFOO: 100% vs. CUSI: 413%
Market capitalization -- CFOO: $13.45M vs. CUSI: $43.9M
CFOO [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $13.45M. CUSI’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $43.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $242.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFOO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCUSI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFOO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CUSI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUSI is a better buy in the long-term than CFOO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUSI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CUSI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CFOO (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CUSI (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +0.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.61% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUSI($43.9M) has a higher market cap than CFOO($13.4M). CUSI YTD gains are higher at: 0.272 vs. CFOO (-13.779). CFOO has less debt than CUSI: CFOO (36.9K) vs CUSI (5.79M).
CFOOCUSICFOO / CUSI
Capitalization13.4M43.9M31%
EBITDA-464.91KN/A-
Gain YTD-13.7790.272-5,071%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue348KN/A-
Total Cash63.6KN/A-
Total Debt36.9K5.79M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUSI: Fundamental Ratings
CUSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFOOCUSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMAKY5.570.02
+0.36%
China Minsheng Banking Corp., Ltd.
MSTH0.01N/A
N/A
Mystic Holdings Inc.
BTRCF12.31N/A
N/A
BETTER COLLECTIVE A S
COIHY16.30-0.20
-1.21%
Croda International Plc
CBSTF0.13N/A
-3.23%
THE CANNABIST COMPANY HOLDINGS INC.

CFOO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFOO and BFNH have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFOO and BFNH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFOO
1D Price
Change %
CFOO100%
N/A
BFNH - CFOO
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFEIY - CFOO
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BABB - CFOO
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.57%
CIADY - CFOO
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
FNEVY - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CUSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUSI and FPAFF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUSI and FPAFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUSI
1D Price
Change %
CUSI100%
+0.22%
FPAFF - CUSI
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIADF - CUSI
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - CUSI
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
CVNZF - CUSI
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFOO - CUSI
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More