CFNB
Price
$18.95
Change
+$0.05 (+0.26%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
170.16M
MA
Price
$572.59
Change
-$1.73 (-0.30%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
519.19B
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFNB vs MA

Header iconCFNB vs MA Comparison
Open Charts CFNB vs MABanner chart's image
California First Leasing
Price$18.95
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
Volume$100
Capitalization170.16M
Mastercard
Price$572.59
Change-$1.73 (-0.30%)
Volume$697
Capitalization519.19B
CFNB vs MA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFNB vs. MA commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFNB is a Hold and MA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CFNB: $18.95 vs. MA: $574.32)
Brand notoriety: CFNB: Not notable vs. MA: Notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFNB: 6% vs. MA: 98%
Market capitalization -- CFNB: $170.16M vs. MA: $519.19B
CFNB [@Savings Banks] is valued at $170.16M. MA’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $519.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $653.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFNB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFNB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MA is a better buy in the long-term than CFNB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFNB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFNB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MA is a better buy in the short-term than CFNB.

Price Growth

CFNB (@Savings Banks) experienced а -0.16% price change this week, while MA (@Savings Banks) price change was +2.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

MA is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.19% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MA($519B) has a higher market cap than CFNB($170M). MA has higher P/E ratio than CFNB: MA (38.73) vs CFNB (5.40). MA YTD gains are higher at: 9.550 vs. CFNB (-19.362). MA has more cash in the bank: 9.37B vs. CFNB (1.13M). CFNB has less debt than MA: CFNB (158K) vs MA (19B). MA has higher revenues than CFNB: MA (30.2B) vs CFNB (45.2M).
CFNBMACFNB / MA
Capitalization170M519B0%
EBITDAN/A18.2B-
Gain YTD-19.3629.550-203%
P/E Ratio5.4038.7314%
Revenue45.2M30.2B0%
Total Cash1.13M9.37B0%
Total Debt158K19B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFNB vs MA: Fundamental Ratings
CFNB
MA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5013
SMR RATING
1..100
5811
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8936
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFNB's Valuation (17) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for MA (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that CFNB’s stock grew significantly faster than MA’s over the last 12 months.

MA's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFNB (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFNB’s over the last 12 months.

MA's SMR Rating (11) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFNB (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFNB’s over the last 12 months.

MA's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as CFNB (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to CFNB’s over the last 12 months.

MA's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFNB (89) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFNBMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
12%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRS35.530.41
+1.17%
TriMas Corp
HSPO12.190.03
+0.25%
Horizon Space Acquisition I Corp
REGCO22.60N/A
N/A
Regency Centers Corp
LAND8.70-0.44
-4.81%
Gladstone Land Corp
EXAS40.99-2.17
-5.03%
Exact Sciences Corp

CFNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFNB and CACC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFNB and CACC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFNB
1D Price
Change %
CFNB100%
N/A
CACC - CFNB
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
COF - CFNB
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
AXP - CFNB
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
V - CFNB
-8%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
MA - CFNB
-11%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%

MA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MA has been loosely correlated with COF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MA jumps, then COF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MA
1D Price
Change %
MA100%
+2.33%
COF - MA
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
OMF - MA
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
SYF - MA
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
PYPL - MA
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
OBDC - MA
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
More