CFLT vs NEOJF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFLT is a Hold and NEOJF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CFLT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEOJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CFLT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NEOJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CFLT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CFLT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CFLT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.19% price change this week, while NEOJF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
CFLT is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CFLT | NEOJF | CFLT / NEOJF | |
| Capitalization | 9.33B | 109M | 8,556% |
| EBITDA | -430.01M | 1.41B | -31% |
| Gain YTD | 33.932 | 33.196 | 102% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 18.42 | - |
| Revenue | 777M | 6.16B | 13% |
| Total Cash | 1.9B | 4.9B | 39% |
| Total Debt | 1.11B | 311K | 358,199% |
| CFLT | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
CFLT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFLT has been loosely correlated with TREIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFLT jumps, then TREIF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CFLT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFLT | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| TREIF - CFLT | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.98% | ||
| DDOG - CFLT | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| PCOR - CFLT | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| MDB - CFLT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| SWI - CFLT | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.84% | ||
More | ||||
NEOJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NEOJF and LIDR have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEOJF and LIDR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NEOJF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEOJF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LIDR - NEOJF | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.17% | ||
| HUBC - NEOJF | 27% Poorly correlated | +9.00% | ||
| RELY - NEOJF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TENB - NEOJF | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.28% | ||
| CFLT - NEOJF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||