CFLT
Price
$17.79
Change
-$0.06 (-0.34%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
6.13B
73 days until earnings call
GRAB
Price
$5.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
20.91B
93 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFLT vs GRAB

Header iconCFLT vs GRAB Comparison
Open Charts CFLT vs GRABBanner chart's image
Confluent
Price$17.79
Change-$0.06 (-0.34%)
Volume$10.41M
Capitalization6.13B
Grab Holdings
Price$5.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$17.79M
Capitalization20.91B
CFLT vs GRAB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFLT vs. GRAB commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFLT is a Hold and GRAB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CFLT: $17.79 vs. GRAB: $5.13)
Brand notoriety: CFLT and GRAB are both not notable
CFLT represents the Computer Communications, while GRAB is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFLT: 129% vs. GRAB: 47%
Market capitalization -- CFLT: $6.13B vs. GRAB: $20.91B
CFLT [@Computer Communications] is valued at $6.13B. GRAB’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $20.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.87T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $324.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.75B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFLT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRAB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CFLT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRAB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CFLT and GRAB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFLT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRAB’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GRAB’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRAB is a better buy in the short-term than CFLT.

Price Growth

CFLT (@Computer Communications) experienced а +8.94% price change this week, while GRAB (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.66%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFLT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

GRAB is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+2.18% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (+0.20% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRAB($20.9B) has a higher market cap than CFLT($6.13B). GRAB YTD gains are higher at: 8.686 vs. CFLT (-36.373). GRAB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 254M vs. CFLT (-371.18M). GRAB has more cash in the bank: 7.16B vs. CFLT (1.94B). CFLT has less debt than GRAB: CFLT (1.11B) vs GRAB (1.91B). GRAB has higher revenues than CFLT: GRAB (3.07B) vs CFLT (1.07B).
CFLTGRABCFLT / GRAB
Capitalization6.13B20.9B29%
EBITDA-371.18M254M-146%
Gain YTD-36.3738.686-419%
P/E RatioN/A256.50-
Revenue1.07B3.07B35%
Total Cash1.94B7.16B27%
Total Debt1.11B1.91B58%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFLTGRAB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETQ1.700.13
+8.28%
T-REX 2X Inverse Ether Daily Target ETF
BBIB98.94-0.23
-0.23%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S.TrsBd3-10YrETF
RSPT41.55-0.25
-0.60%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Tech ETF
GLIN44.45-0.40
-0.89%
VanEck India Growth Ldrs ETF
CXSE38.23-0.75
-1.92%
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owd Entpr ETF

CFLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFLT has been loosely correlated with SPSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFLT jumps, then SPSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFLT
1D Price
Change %
CFLT100%
-0.34%
SPSC - CFLT
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
DDOG - CFLT
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
HUBS - CFLT
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
PCOR - CFLT
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
TREIF - CFLT
52%
Loosely correlated
+5.88%
More

GRAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRAB has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRAB jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRAB
1D Price
Change %
GRAB100%
+0.20%
QTWO - GRAB
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
AVPT - GRAB
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.20%
NET - GRAB
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
CPAY - GRAB
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
CFLT - GRAB
39%
Loosely correlated
+3.24%
More