CFLT
Price
$30.11
Change
-$0.03 (-0.10%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
10.64B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CLSK
Price
$10.91
Change
-$0.49 (-4.30%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.91B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFLT vs CLSK

Header iconCFLT vs CLSK Comparison
Open Charts CFLT vs CLSKBanner chart's image
Confluent
Price$30.11
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
Volume$1.95M
Capitalization10.64B
CleanSpark
Price$10.91
Change-$0.49 (-4.30%)
Volume$16.51M
Capitalization2.91B
CFLT vs CLSK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFLT vs. CLSK commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFLT is a Buy and CLSK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CFLT: $30.11 vs. CLSK: $10.91)
Brand notoriety: CFLT and CLSK are both not notable
CFLT represents the Computer Communications, while CLSK is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFLT: 15% vs. CLSK: 52%
Market capitalization -- CFLT: $10.63B vs. CLSK: $2.79B
CFLT [@Computer Communications] is valued at $10.63B. CLSK’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.62T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.46B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFLT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CFLT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the long-term than CFLT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFLT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFLT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFLT is a better buy in the short-term than CLSK.

Price Growth

CFLT (@Computer Communications) experienced а +0.50% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -9.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.19%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFLT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-0.32% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.40% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFLT($10.6B) has a higher market cap than CLSK($2.91B). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 23.778 vs. CFLT (7.797). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 763M vs. CFLT (-358.71M). CFLT has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. CLSK (1.01B). CLSK has less debt than CFLT: CLSK (824M) vs CFLT (1.11B). CFLT has higher revenues than CLSK: CFLT (1.11B) vs CLSK (766M).
CFLTCLSKCFLT / CLSK
Capitalization10.6B2.91B364%
EBITDA-358.71M763M-47%
Gain YTD7.79723.77833%
P/E RatioN/A10.18-
Revenue1.11B766M145%
Total Cash1.99B1.01B197%
Total Debt1.11B824M134%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFLTCLSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CLSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XOEX37.040.19
+0.51%
Xtrackers S&P 100 Ex Top 20 ETF
JRS7.580.03
+0.40%
Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund
BLDG24.410.08
+0.34%
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
THMZ32.860.07
+0.21%
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF
UGL60.34-0.50
-0.82%
ProShares Ultra Gold

CFLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFLT has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFLT jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFLT
1D Price
Change %
CFLT100%
+0.30%
COIN - CFLT
71%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
CLSK - CFLT
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
RIOT - CFLT
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
SPSC - CFLT
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
DDOG - CFLT
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
More

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
-0.96%
MARA - CLSK
82%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
RIOT - CLSK
79%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
MSTR - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
BITF - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
COIN - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
More