Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFIZX vs RLBFX
CFIZX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CFIZX vs RLBFX
Columbia Flexible Capital Income Inst
Price$14.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.27
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
CFIZX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFIZX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIZX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. CFIZX (1.24B). CFIZX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: CFIZX (4.96) vs RLBFX (2.10). CFIZX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CFIZX (14 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). CFIZX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CFIZX (36.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFIZX: RLBFX (250) vs CFIZX (2000). CFIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.66 vs. RLBFX (10.60). CFIZX return over 5 years is better than : 47.92 vs. RLBFX (41.40).
| CFIZX | RLBFX | CFIZX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.29 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.29 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.240 | 9.189 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 254B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.96 | 2.10 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.66 | 10.60 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.70 | 35.79 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.92 | 41.40 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.93 | 68.15 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement