Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFIGX vs RLBFX
CFIGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CFIGX vs RLBFX
Columbia Flexible Capital Income C
Price$13.98
Change-$0.10 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.69
Change-$0.31 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
CFIGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFIGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIGX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. CFIGX (1.21B). CFIGX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: CFIGX (4.15) vs RLBFX (2.18). CFIGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CFIGX (14 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). CFIGX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CFIGX (36.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFIGX: RLBFX (250) vs CFIGX (2000). CFIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.96 vs. RLBFX (5.61). RLBFX (40.09) and CFIGX (39.05) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CFIGX | RLBFX | CFIGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.29 | 652% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.29 | 652% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.540 | 4.560 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 244B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.15 | 2.18 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 5.61 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.87 | 33.66 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.05 | 40.09 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.32 | 60.51 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement