Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFIGX vs RLBFX
CFIGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CFIGX vs RLBFX
Columbia Flexible Capital Income C
Price$14.30
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.94
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
CFIGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFIGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIGX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. CFIGX (1.24B). CFIGX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: CFIGX (4.01) vs RLBFX (2.10). CFIGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CFIGX (14 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). CFIGX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CFIGX (36.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFIGX: RLBFX (250) vs CFIGX (2000). CFIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.40 vs. RLBFX (8.18). CFIGX (44.43) and RLBFX (43.24) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CFIGX | RLBFX | CFIGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.29 | 652% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.29 | 652% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.943 | 8.222 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 252B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.01 | 2.10 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.40 | 8.18 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.32 | 36.13 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.43 | 43.24 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.36 | 68.15 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement