Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFIGX vs RLBAX
CFIGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CFIGX vs RLBAX
Columbia Flexible Capital Income C
Price$14.56
Change-$0.07 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.04
Change-$0.16 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.26B
CFIGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFIGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIGX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. CFIGX (1.26B). CFIGX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CFIGX (3.88) vs RLBAX (1.15). CFIGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CFIGX (14 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). CFIGX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). CFIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFIGX: RLBAX (250) vs CFIGX (2000). CFIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. RLBAX (6.99). CFIGX return over 5 years is better than : 42.30 vs. RLBAX (39.63).
| CFIGX | RLBAX | CFIGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.31 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.31 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.881 | 12.236 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.88 | 1.15 | 337% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 6.99 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.90 | 47.80 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.30 | 39.63 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.86 | 74.05 | 121% |