CFIC
Price
$6.72
Change
-$0.39 (-5.49%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
7.75M
HRGG
Price
$14.50
Change
+$0.50 (+3.57%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.47M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFIC vs HRGG

Header iconCFIC vs HRGG Comparison
Open Charts CFIC vs HRGGBanner chart's image
Cornerstone Financial Corp. (NJ)
Price$6.72
Change-$0.39 (-5.49%)
Volume$4.86K
Capitalization7.75M
Heritage Nola Ban
Price$14.50
Change+$0.50 (+3.57%)
Volume$372
Capitalization25.47M
CFIC vs HRGG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HRGG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFIC vs. HRGG commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIC is a Hold and HRGG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CFIC: $6.72 vs. HRGG: $14.50)
Brand notoriety: CFIC and HRGG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFIC: 100% vs. HRGG: 65%
Market capitalization -- CFIC: $7.75M vs. HRGG: $25.47M
CFIC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.75M. HRGG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $25.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFIC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHRGG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HRGG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HRGG is a better buy in the long-term than CFIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HRGG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HRGG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CFIC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HRGG (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRGG($25.5M) has a higher market cap than CFIC($7.75M). CFIC YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. HRGG (-3.333). CFIC has less debt than HRGG: CFIC (18M) vs HRGG (19.2M). CFIC has higher revenues than HRGG: CFIC (14.4M) vs HRGG (4.64M).
CFICHRGGCFIC / HRGG
Capitalization7.75M25.5M30%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-3.333-
P/E RatioN/A68.97-
Revenue14.4M4.64M310%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt18M19.2M94%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFIC vs HRGG: Fundamental Ratings
CFIC
HRGG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5094
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
939
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7356
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1008
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFIC's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HRGG (90). This means that CFIC’s stock grew significantly faster than HRGG’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as CFIC (100). This means that HRGG’s stock grew similarly to CFIC’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFIC (93). This means that HRGG’s stock grew significantly faster than CFIC’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CFIC (73). This means that HRGG’s stock grew similarly to CFIC’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFIC (100). This means that HRGG’s stock grew significantly faster than CFIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFICHRGG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HRGG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X109232.0700001000.882800
+0.92%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY625.344.89
+0.79%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL213.551.11
+0.52%
Apple
TSLA315.35-0.30
-0.10%
Tesla
GME23.59-0.36
-1.50%
GameStop Corp

CFIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFIC and HRGG have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFIC and HRGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFIC
1D Price
Change %
CFIC100%
N/A
HRGG - CFIC
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.57%
CFBK - CFIC
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
CADE - CFIC
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
FXNC - CFIC
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
HFBL - CFIC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
More

HRGG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRGG has been loosely correlated with KGTFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRGG jumps, then KGTFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRGG
1D Price
Change %
HRGG100%
+3.57%
KGTFY - HRGG
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BPHLF - HRGG
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CFIC - HRGG
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIFF - HRGG
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFDB - HRGG
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More