Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFIAX vs RLBFX
CFIAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CFIAX vs RLBFX
Columbia Flexible Capital Income A
Price$14.74
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
CFIAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFIAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. CFIAX (1.26B). CFIAX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: CFIAX (4.55) vs RLBFX (2.05). CFIAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CFIAX (14 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). CFIAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). CFIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFIAX: RLBFX (250) vs CFIAX (2000). CFIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.65 vs. RLBFX (10.28). CFIAX (42.87) and RLBFX (41.46) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CFIAX | RLBFX | CFIAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.29 | 393% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.29 | 393% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.246 | 11.562 | 80% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 259B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.55 | 2.05 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.65 | 10.28 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.33 | 40.92 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.87 | 41.46 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.31 | 78.40 | 115% |