Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFIAX vs RLBAX
CFIAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CFIAX vs RLBAX
Columbia Flexible Capital Income A
Price$14.74
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.59
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
CFIAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFIAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIAX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. CFIAX (1.26B). CFIAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CFIAX (4.55) vs RLBAX (1.15). CFIAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CFIAX (14 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than CFIAX (1.14). CFIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFIAX: RLBAX (250) vs CFIAX (2000). CFIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.65 vs. RLBAX (9.12). CFIAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.87 vs. RLBAX (35.40).
| CFIAX | RLBAX | CFIAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.31 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.31 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.246 | 10.805 | 86% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 259B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.55 | 1.15 | 395% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.65 | 9.12 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.33 | 37.15 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.87 | 35.40 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.31 | 67.71 | 133% |