Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFGRX vs RGACX
CFGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CFGRX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.45
Change-$1.34 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
CFGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFGRX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. CFGRX (209M). CFGRX pays higher dividends than RGACX: CFGRX (0.09) vs RGACX (0.07). CFGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CFGRX (31 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CFGRX (0.74). RGACX (32.00) and CFGRX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFGRX: RGACX (250) vs CFGRX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. CFGRX (-7.86). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 31.42 vs. CFGRX (9.87).
| CFGRX | RGACX | CFGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.93 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.93 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.905 | 20.558 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.09 | 0.07 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.86 | 6.27 | -125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.08 | 67.13 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.87 | 31.42 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.83 | 99.84 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers