Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFGRX vs RGACX
CFGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CFGRX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.65
Change-$0.84 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
CFGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFGRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. CFGRX (204M). CFGRX pays higher dividends than RGACX: CFGRX (0.10) vs RGACX (0.00). CFGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CFGRX (31 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CFGRX (0.74). RGACX (32.00) and CFGRX (31.00) have comparable annual turnover. RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFGRX: RGACX (250) vs CFGRX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.96 vs. CFGRX (-5.25). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 18.14 vs. CFGRX (5.09).
| CFGRX | RGACX | CFGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.93 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.93 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.686 | 1.549 | -44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 204M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.25 | 8.96 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.91 | 54.48 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.09 | 18.14 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.34 | 115.80 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement