CFG
Price
$59.86
Change
+$0.35 (+0.59%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
25.71B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WBS
Price
$64.53
Change
+$0.21 (+0.33%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
10.41B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs WBS

Header iconCFG vs WBS Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs WBSBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$59.86
Change+$0.35 (+0.59%)
Volume$1.11M
Capitalization25.71B
Webster Financial
Price$64.53
Change+$0.21 (+0.33%)
Volume$370.85K
Capitalization10.41B
CFG vs WBS Comparison Chart in %
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. WBS commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a StrongBuy and WBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CFG: $59.86 vs. WBS: $64.53)
Brand notoriety: CFG and WBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 25% vs. WBS: 27%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $25.71B vs. WBS: $10.41B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.71B. WBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WBS is a better buy in the long-term than CFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the short-term than WBS.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.13% price change this week, while WBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

WBS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFG($25.7B) has a higher market cap than WBS($10.4B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than WBS: CFG (16.77) vs WBS (12.02). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 42.038 vs. WBS (20.277). CFG has more cash in the bank: 8.55B vs. WBS (425M). WBS has less debt than CFG: WBS (3.81B) vs CFG (10.7B). CFG has higher revenues than WBS: CFG (8.06B) vs WBS (2.81B).
CFGWBSCFG / WBS
Capitalization25.7B10.4B247%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD42.03820.277207%
P/E Ratio16.7712.02140%
Revenue8.06B2.81B287%
Total Cash8.55B425M2,011%
Total Debt10.7B3.81B281%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs WBS: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
WBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2620
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3941
SMR RATING
1..100
79
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5255
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WBS's Valuation (55) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (78) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBS’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WBS (41) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's SMR Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WBS (9) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WBS (45) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than WBS’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WBS (55) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to WBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGWBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIAT27.290.15
+0.55%
YieldMax Short COIN Option Inc Strgy ETF
QQJG28.330.09
+0.32%
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
JHCB21.730.07
+0.30%
JHancock Corporate Bond ETF
UTWO48.630.03
+0.06%
F/m US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF
FLRN30.710.01
+0.03%
State Street® SPDR® Blmbg InvGrdFltRtETF

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with TFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then TFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
+0.59%
TFC - CFG
93%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
WBS - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
FNB - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
HBAN - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
KEY - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
More

WBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WBS has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WBS jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WBS
1D Price
Change %
WBS100%
+0.33%
FNB - WBS
93%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
CFG - WBS
92%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
WTFC - WBS
92%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
ASB - WBS
91%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
EWBC - WBS
90%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
More