CFG
Price
$51.71
Change
-$0.80 (-1.52%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
22.31B
39 days until earnings call
WAL
Price
$90.65
Change
-$0.69 (-0.76%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
10B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs WAL

Header iconCFG vs WAL Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs WALBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$51.71
Change-$0.80 (-1.52%)
Volume$3M
Capitalization22.31B
Western Alliance Ban
Price$90.65
Change-$0.69 (-0.76%)
Volume$1.21M
Capitalization10B
CFG vs WAL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. WAL commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a StrongBuy and WAL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CFG: $51.71 vs. WAL: $90.65)
Brand notoriety: CFG and WAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 65% vs. WAL: 118%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $22.31B vs. WAL: $10B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.31B. WAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWAL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the long-term than WAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAL’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WAL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WAL is a better buy in the short-term than CFG.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while WAL (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

WAL is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFG($22.3B) has a higher market cap than WAL($10B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than WAL: CFG (15.77) vs WAL (11.91). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 21.600 vs. WAL (9.999). CFG has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. WAL (440M). WAL has less debt than CFG: WAL (6.89B) vs CFG (12.8B). CFG has higher revenues than WAL: CFG (7.85B) vs WAL (3.21B).
CFGWALCFG / WAL
Capitalization22.3B10B223%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.6009.999216%
P/E Ratio15.7711.91132%
Revenue7.85B3.21B244%
Total Cash11.5B440M2,614%
Total Debt12.8B6.89B186%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs WAL: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
WAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2514
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4061
SMR RATING
1..100
79
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5052
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WAL's Valuation (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (77). This means that WAL’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAL (61). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to WAL’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's SMR Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAL (9). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to WAL’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAL (43). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to WAL’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAL (52). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to WAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGWAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSCC29.320.13
+0.46%
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF
VEGN57.500.26
+0.46%
US Vegan Climate ETF
TOTL40.530.18
+0.45%
SPDR® DoubleLine® Total Return Tact ETF
FFLG28.31-0.15
-0.51%
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Gr ETF
SSG11.22-0.08
-0.71%
ProShares UltraShort Semiconductors

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with KEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then KEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
-1.52%
KEY - CFG
93%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
HBAN - CFG
93%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
FNB - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
TFC - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
ZION - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
More

WAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAL has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WAL jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WAL
1D Price
Change %
WAL100%
-0.76%
FNB - WAL
88%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
BKU - WAL
87%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
ASB - WAL
87%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
CFG - WAL
87%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
WBS - WAL
87%
Closely correlated
-1.45%
More