CFG
Price
$47.02
Change
-$1.28 (-2.65%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.64B
84 days until earnings call
RF
Price
$24.32
Change
-$0.33 (-1.34%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.9B
85 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CFG vs RF

Header iconCFG vs RF Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs RFBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$47.02
Change-$1.28 (-2.65%)
Volume$29.62K
Capitalization16.64B
Regions Financial
Price$24.32
Change-$0.33 (-1.34%)
Volume$75.27K
Capitalization18.9B
CFG vs RF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. RF commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a Hold and RF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CFG: $48.31 vs. RF: $24.65)
Brand notoriety: CFG: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 111% vs. RF: 156%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $16.64B vs. RF: $18.9B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $16.64B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the long-term than RF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the short-term than CFG.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.71% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

RF is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($18.9B) has a higher market cap than CFG($16.6B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than RF: CFG (11.39) vs RF (9.74). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 10.398 vs. RF (4.804). CFG has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. RF (1.55B). RF has less debt than CFG: RF (2.33B) vs CFG (14B). CFG has higher revenues than RF: CFG (8.22B) vs RF (7.57B).
CFGRFCFG / RF
Capitalization16.6B18.9B88%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.3984.804216%
P/E Ratio11.399.74117%
Revenue8.22B7.57B109%
Total Cash11.6B1.55B746%
Total Debt14B2.33B601%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1810
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5028
SMR RATING
1..100
67
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1328
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1622
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFG's Valuation (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (78) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (7) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (28) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (22) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with ZION. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then ZION could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
+1.62%
ZION - CFG
88%
Closely correlated
+1.71%
RF - CFG
87%
Closely correlated
+1.86%
FITB - CFG
86%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
HWC - CFG
86%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
PNC - CFG
84%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+1.86%
HBAN - RF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
CFG - RF
87%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
HWC - RF
86%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
ASB - RF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
PNFP - RF
85%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
More