CFG
Price
$65.97
Change
+$14.12 (+27.23%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
28.32B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RF
Price
$29.83
Change
+$4.52 (+17.86%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.89B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs RF

Header iconCFG vs RF Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs RFBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$65.97
Change+$14.12 (+27.23%)
Volume$6.79M
Capitalization28.32B
Regions Financial
Price$29.83
Change+$4.52 (+17.86%)
Volume$18.51M
Capitalization25.89B
CFG vs RF Comparison Chart in %
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. RF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a StrongBuy and RF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CFG: $65.97 vs. RF: $29.83)
Brand notoriety: CFG: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 129% vs. RF: 142%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $28.32B vs. RF: $25.89B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $28.32B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $25.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the long-term than CFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the short-term than CFG.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.02% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.

RF is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFG($28.3B) has a higher market cap than RF($25.9B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than RF: CFG (17.09) vs RF (12.97). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 12.943 vs. RF (10.074). CFG has more cash in the bank: 8.55B vs. RF (3.25B). RF has less debt than CFG: RF (6.09B) vs CFG (10.7B). CFG has higher revenues than RF: CFG (8.06B) vs RF (7.42B).
CFGRFCFG / RF
Capitalization28.3B25.9B109%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.94310.074128%
P/E Ratio17.0912.97132%
Revenue8.06B7.42B109%
Total Cash8.55B3.25B263%
Total Debt10.7B6.09B176%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8114
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3929
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
718
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3846
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (66) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (79) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (39) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (7) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (18) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (46) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESIX33.110.08
+0.25%
State Street® SPDR® S&P SmCap 600 ESGETF
SHM48.240.02
+0.04%
Stt Strt® SPDR® Nuveen ICE S/T MuncplETF
IBND32.45N/A
N/A
SPDR® Blmbg Intl Corp Bd ETF
XSEP42.60-0.14
-0.33%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Sep
UNHG11.47-0.14
-1.21%
Leverage Shares 2X Long UNH Daily ETF

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with KEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then KEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
+1.71%
KEY - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
FNB - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
+2.52%
TFC - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
PNC - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
+2.72%
WTFC - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
+4.23%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+2.44%
FITB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
HBAN - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+2.85%
MTB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
FNB - RF
91%
Closely correlated
+2.52%
CFG - RF
90%
Closely correlated
+1.71%
More