CFG
Price
$58.35
Change
-$0.11 (-0.19%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
25.06B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ONB
Price
$22.95
Change
-$0.38 (-1.63%)
Updated
Dec 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.11B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs ONB

Header iconCFG vs ONB Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs ONBBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$58.35
Change-$0.11 (-0.19%)
Volume$7.92M
Capitalization25.06B
Old National Ban
Price$22.95
Change-$0.38 (-1.63%)
Volume$58.79K
Capitalization9.11B
CFG vs ONB Comparison Chart in %
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ONB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. ONB commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a StrongBuy and ONB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (CFG: $58.35 vs. ONB: $23.32)
Brand notoriety: CFG and ONB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 163% vs. ONB: 77%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $25.06B vs. ONB: $9.11B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.06B. ONB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileONB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ONB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ONB is a better buy in the long-term than CFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ONB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the short-term than ONB.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.42% price change this week, while ONB (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

ONB is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFG($25.1B) has a higher market cap than ONB($9.11B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than ONB: CFG (16.34) vs ONB (13.72). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 38.455 vs. ONB (9.512). CFG has more cash in the bank: 8.55B vs. ONB (638M). ONB has less debt than CFG: ONB (6.71B) vs CFG (12.8B). CFG has higher revenues than ONB: CFG (8.06B) vs ONB (2.11B).
CFGONBCFG / ONB
Capitalization25.1B9.11B275%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.4559.512404%
P/E Ratio16.3413.72119%
Revenue8.06B2.11B383%
Total Cash8.55B638M1,340%
Total Debt12.8B6.71B191%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs ONB: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
ONB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2922
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3735
SMR RATING
1..100
711
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5546
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ONB's Valuation (52) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (78). This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (37). This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's SMR Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (11). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (48). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (55). This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGONB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ONB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DTCCX14.390.06
+0.42%
BNY Mellon Sust US Equity C
USDEUR0.85N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - Euro
EURGBP0.87N/A
N/A
Euro - United Kingdom Pound
JPYCAD0.01N/A
N/A
Japan Yen - Canadian Dollar
TBCUX16.27-1.17
-6.71%
Tweedy, Browne Intl Val II - Ccy UnH

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with WBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then WBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
-0.19%
WBS - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
FNB - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
TFC - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
KEY - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
HBAN - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
More