CFG
Price
$51.72
Change
-$0.94 (-1.79%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
22.62B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MTB
Price
$186.35
Change
-$1.80 (-0.96%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
28.92B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs MTB

Header iconCFG vs MTB Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs MTBBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$51.72
Change-$0.94 (-1.79%)
Volume$26.18K
Capitalization22.62B
M&T Bank
Price$186.35
Change-$1.80 (-0.96%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization28.92B
CFG vs MTB Comparison Chart in %
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. MTB commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a StrongBuy and MTB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CFG: $52.66 vs. MTB: $188.15)
Brand notoriety: CFG and MTB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 88% vs. MTB: 74%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $22.21B vs. MTB: $28.64B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.21B. MTB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $28.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the long-term than MTB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MTB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the short-term than MTB.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.37% price change this week, while MTB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

MTB is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTB($28.9B) has a higher market cap than CFG($22.6B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than MTB: CFG (14.75) vs MTB (11.61). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 24.954 vs. MTB (2.296). CFG has more cash in the bank: 8.55B vs. MTB (2.13B). CFG has less debt than MTB: CFG (12.8B) vs MTB (14.4B). MTB has higher revenues than CFG: MTB (9.39B) vs CFG (8.06B).
CFGMTBCFG / MTB
Capitalization22.6B28.9B78%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.9542.2961,087%
P/E Ratio14.7511.61127%
Revenue8.06B9.39B86%
Total Cash8.55B2.13B402%
Total Debt12.8B14.4B89%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs MTB: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
MTB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
105
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4032
SMR RATING
1..100
76
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6777
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTB's Valuation (67) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (76). This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (40). This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (7). This means that MTB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTB (57). This means that CFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTB’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (77). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGMTB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFUT25.730.12
+0.46%
Putnam Sustainable Future ETF
EUM20.130.05
+0.26%
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets
GENM10.30-0.03
-0.24%
Genter Capital Municipal Qual Interm ETF
CMU3.50-0.02
-0.57%
MFS High Yield Municipal Trust
HACK86.02-1.13
-1.30%
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with KEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then KEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
+0.80%
KEY - CFG
94%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
WBS - CFG
93%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
FNB - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
TFC - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
WTFC - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
More

MTB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTB has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTB jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTB
1D Price
Change %
MTB100%
+0.74%
CFG - MTB
91%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
PNC - MTB
90%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
HBAN - MTB
90%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
FITB - MTB
90%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
KEY - MTB
89%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
More