CFG
Price
$47.72
Change
+$0.69 (+1.47%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
16.64B
10 days until earnings call
MRBK
Price
$13.96
Change
+$0.21 (+1.53%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
107.83M
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs MRBK

Header iconCFG vs MRBK Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs MRBKBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$47.72
Change+$0.69 (+1.47%)
Volume$3.3M
Capitalization16.64B
Meridian
Price$13.96
Change+$0.21 (+1.53%)
Volume$75.8K
Capitalization107.83M
CFG vs MRBK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. MRBK commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a Buy and MRBK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CFG: $47.72 vs. MRBK: $13.96)
Brand notoriety: CFG and MRBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 71% vs. MRBK: 108%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $16.64B vs. MRBK: $107.83M
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $16.64B. MRBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $107.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMRBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MRBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the long-term than MRBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRBK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MRBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the short-term than MRBK.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.16% price change this week, while MRBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +13.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

MRBK is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFG($16.6B) has a higher market cap than MRBK($108M). CFG has higher P/E ratio than MRBK: CFG (11.39) vs MRBK (8.31). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 11.249 vs. MRBK (3.547). CFG has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. MRBK (13.7M). MRBK has less debt than CFG: MRBK (49.8M) vs CFG (14B). CFG has higher revenues than MRBK: CFG (8.22B) vs MRBK (101M).
CFGMRBKCFG / MRBK
Capitalization16.6B108M15,370%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.2493.547317%
P/E Ratio11.398.31137%
Revenue8.22B101M8,143%
Total Cash11.6B13.7M84,672%
Total Debt14B49.8M28,112%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs MRBK: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
MRBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4648
SMR RATING
1..100
640
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3657
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRBK's Valuation (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (48). This means that MRBK’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MRBK (48). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to MRBK’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRBK (40). This means that CFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRBK’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRBK (48). This means that CFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRBK’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MRBK (57). This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to MRBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGMRBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFLYY1.230.05
+4.24%
Air France-KLM
FUJHY8.750.23
+2.70%
Subaru Corporation
NZRFF1.00N/A
N/A
CHANNEL INFRASTRUCTURE NZ LTD
RDRIF0.33N/A
N/A
New Stratus Energy Inc.
FNMAO18.75N/A
N/A
Fannie Mae

CFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFG has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFG jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFG
1D Price
Change %
CFG100%
+1.47%
SNV - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
N/A
HBAN - CFG
92%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
ZION - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
TFC - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
PNC - CFG
91%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
More

MRBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRBK has been loosely correlated with PNFP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRBK jumps, then PNFP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRBK
1D Price
Change %
MRBK100%
+1.53%
PNFP - MRBK
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
UCB - MRBK
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
HWC - MRBK
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
CFG - MRBK
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
ONB - MRBK
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
More